Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301097›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Derived Techniques.

Kantipudi Nirmal Babu, Thotten Elampilay Sheeja, Divakaran Minoo, Muliyar Krishna Rajesh, Kukkamgai Samsudeen, Erinjery Jose Suraby, Illathidath Payatatti Vijesh Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Factors affecting the genetic diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DNA Fingerprint Profile ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What Can Genetics Do for the Control of Infectious Diseases in Aquaculture?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kantipudi Nirmal BabuIndian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. nirmalbabu30@hotmail.com.
Thotten Elampilay SheejaIndian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Divakaran MinooProvidence Women's College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Muliyar Krishna RajeshCentral Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Kukkamgai SamsudeenCentral Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Erinjery Jose SurabyIndian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Illathidath Payatatti Vijesh KumarIndian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding biology and genetics at molecular level has become very important for dissection and manipulation of genome architecture for addressing evolutionary and taxonomic questions. Knowledge of genetic variation and genetic relationship among genotypes is an important consideration for classification, utilization of germplasm resources, and breeding. Molecular markers have contributed significantly in this respect and have been widely used in plant science in a number of ways, including genetic fingerprinting, diagnostics, identification of duplicates and selection of core collections, determination of genetic distances, genome analysis, development of molecular maps, and identification of markers associated with desirable breeding traits. The application of molecular markers largely depends on the type of markers employed, distribution of markers in the genome, type of loci they amplify, level of polymorphism, and reproducibility of products. Among many DNA markers available, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) is the simplest, is cost-effective, and can be performed in a moderate laboratory for most of its applications. In addition, RAPDs can touch much of the genome and has the advantage that no prior knowledge of the genome under research is necessary. The recent improvements in the RAPD technique like arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR), sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR), DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF), sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences (CAPS), random amplified microsatellite polymorphism (RAMPO), and random amplified hybridization microsatellites (RAHM) can complement the shortcomings of RAPDs and have enhanced the utility of this simple technique for specific applications. Simple protocols for these techniques are presented along with the applications of RAPD in genetic diversity analysis, mapping, varietal identification, genetic fidelity testing, etc.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueChromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticDNA FingerprintingEvolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenomicsPhylogenyPlant BreedingPlantsAP-PCRBulked segregant analysisCAPSCultivar identificationDAFDNA fingerprintingGenetic diversityGenetic fidelityMappingPopulation and evolutionary geneticsRAHMRAMPOSCARSRAP

Identifiers

PMID33301097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.