Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301093›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

High-Throughput Genotyping Technologies in Plant Taxonomy.

Monica F Danilevicz, Cassandria G Tay Fernandez, Jacob I Marsh, Philipp E Bayer, David Edwards

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monica F DanileviczSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Cassandria G Tay FernandezSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Jacob I MarshSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. dave.edwards@uwa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular markers provide researchers with a powerful tool for variation analysis between plant genomes. They are heritable and widely distributed across the genome and for this reason have many applications in plant taxonomy and genotyping. Over the last decade, molecular marker technology has developed rapidly and is now a crucial component for genetic linkage analysis, trait mapping, diversity analysis, and association studies. This chapter focuses on molecular marker discovery, its application, and future perspectives for plant genotyping through pangenome assemblies. Included are descriptions of automated methods for genome and sequence distance estimation, genome contaminant analysis in sequence reads, genome structural variation, and SNP discovery methods.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysComputational BiologyDNA ContaminationEvolution, MolecularGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypePhylogenyPlantsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic MarkersMashPangenomePAVPhylogeneticPresence and absence variationSingle nucleotide polymorphismSNP

Identifiers

PMID33301093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.