ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
Plant Taxonomy: A Historical Perspective, Current Challenges, and Perspectives.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative chemotaxonomic and micromorphological insights into Peucedanum (Apiaceae).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A comparison of interspecific and intraspecific phenotypic variation in spectral signatures of ferns with robust versus uncertain species boundaries.Journal of plant research · 2026Article
- Morphological diversity of pollen and spores in a human-impacted highland forest-agriculture mosaic in northern Thailand.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Morphological characterization of Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T. Aiton, a neglected medicinal plant.PloS one · 2026Article
- American highbush cranberry maintains strong population structure despite naturalization of Eurasian relatives in North America.American journal of botany · 2025Article
- An eDNA Survey of Plant Biodiversity in a Local Dam Within South Africa's Largest City.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Chemotaxonomy, an Efficient Tool for Medicinal Plant Identification: Current Trends and Limitations.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diversity Patterns of Plant Communities along an Elevational Gradient in Arid and Semi-Arid Mountain Ecosystems in China.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Photinia serratifolia.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Expansion of the distribution range ofBiodiversity data journal · 2023Article
- Fungal taxonomy: current status and research agendas for the interdisciplinary and globalisation era.Mycology · 2023Review
- GAGE is a method for identification of plant species based on whole genome analysis and genome editing.Communications biology · 2022Article
- ThePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Taxonomy is the science that explores, describes, names, and classifies all organisms. In this introductory chapter, we highlight the major historical steps in the elaboration of this science, which provides baseline data for all fields of biology and plays a vital role for society but is also an independent, complex, and sound hypothesis-driven scientific discipline.In a first part, we underline that plant taxonomy is one of the earliest scientific disciplines that emerged thousands of years ago, even before the important contributions of the Greeks and Romans (e.g., Theophrastus, Pliny the Elder, and Dioscorides). In the fifteenth-sixteenth centuries, plant taxonomy benefited from the Great Navigations, the invention of the printing press, the creation of botanic gardens, and the use of the drying technique to preserve plant specimens. In parallel with the growing body of morpho-anatomical data, subsequent major steps in the history of plant taxonomy include the emergence of the concept of natural classification , the adoption of the binomial naming system (with the major role of Linnaeus) and other universal rules for the naming of plants, the formulation of the principle of subordination of characters, and the advent of the evolutionary thought. More recently, the cladistic theory (initiated by Hennig) and the rapid advances in DNA technologies allowed to infer phylogenies and to propose true natural, genealogy-based classifications.In a second part, we put the emphasis on the challenges that plant taxonomy faces nowadays. The still very incomplete taxonomic knowledge of the worldwide flora (the so-called taxonomic impediment) is seriously hampering conservation efforts that are especially crucial as biodiversity has entered its sixth extinction crisis. It appears mainly due to insufficient funding, lack of taxonomic expertise, and lack of communication and coordination. We then review recent initiatives to overcome these limitations and to anticipate how taxonomy should and could evolve. In particular, the use of molecular data has been era-splitting for taxonomy and may allow an accelerated pace of species discovery. We examine both strengths and limitations of such techniques in comparison to morphology-based investigations, we give broad recommendations on the use of molecular tools for plant taxonomy, and we highlight the need for an integrative taxonomy based on evidence from multiple sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33301085What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.