Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301083›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2021

[Clinical outcome and revenue situation after conservative, interventional and surgical/osteosynthetic treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures].

Julian Ramin Andresen, Axel Prokop, Mathias Wollny, Sebastian Radmer, Hans-Christof Schober, Reimer Andresen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julian Ramin AndresenFakultät für Medizin, Sigmund-Freud-Privatuniversität, Freudplatz 3, 1020, Wien, Österreich. 1600556@uni.sfu.ac.at.
Axel ProkopKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Tübingen, Sindelfingen, Deutschland.
Mathias WollnyMedimbursement, Tarmstedt, Deutschland.
Sebastian RadmerZentrum für Bewegungsheilkunde, Facharztpraxis für Orthopädie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Hans-Christof SchoberKlinik für Innere Medizin IV, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland.
Reimer AndresenInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Neuroradiologie, Westküstenklinikum Heide, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universitäten Kiel, Lübeck und Hamburg, Heide, Deutschland.
Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen · DEKlinikum Südstadt Rostock · DEZentrum Überleben · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsufficiency fractures of the sacrum are being detected increasingly more frequently, whereby their incidence will no doubt increase further as a result of the rise in life expectancy.

objectiveThe clinical appearance of sacral insufficiency fractures, the treatment approach taking into account the clinical outcomes and the DRG proceeds are discussed on the basis of clinical examples. PATIENTS AND

methodsThree female patients (average age 78.3 years) with sacral insufficiency fractures were admitted for inpatient treatment due to increasing disabling pain. Taking into account the clinical symptoms and the recommendation of an interdisciplinary case conference, one patient was treated conservatively with short-term bed rest, accompanying analgesic medication and pain-adapted exercise measures. The second patient underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided balloon sacroplasty. Transsacroiliac screw fixation was performed on the third patient. Pain was documented over the course on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the degree of independence on the Barthel scale. The fractures were classified according to Denis et al. and the classification of the FFP according to Rommens and Hofmann. The DRG revenue for the 2020 accounting period was then presented for each case.

resultsPatient No. 1: conservative therapy, unilateral Denis 1 fracture zone, corresponding to an FFP type IIa, baseline pain 7 score points, at discharge 4 score points, the Barthel scale increased from 55 to 75 points. After 6 days hospitalization, transferred to rehab. The DRG proceeds were € 3817.95. Patient No. 2: balloon sacroplasty, bilateral Denis 1-2 fracture zone, corresponding to an FFP type IIa, baseline pain 9 score points, at discharge 2 score points, the Barthel scale increased from 35 to 95 points. After 4 days hospitalization, discharged to outpatient follow-up treatment. The DRG proceeds were € 7409.44. Patient No. 3: osteosynthesis, bilateral Denis 1 fracture zone, corresponding to an FFP type IIa, baseline pain 7 score points, at discharge 2 score points, the Barthel scale increased from 40 to 90 points. After 5 days hospitalization, transferred to rehab. The DRG proceeds were € 6714.30.

conclusionThe sacral insufficiency fracture is a strong indicator for the presence of manifest osteoporosis. Fracture risk factors are the female sex, advanced age, the presence of osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency. Conservative therapy is the first step of the treatment cascade; however, in patients with persistent, disabling pain and no potential for mobilization, sacroplasty or osteosynthesis should be performed at an early stage. In patients treated with coordinated therapy processes and without clinical complications, all three treatment options are economically sufficient.

Indexed as

Fractures, StressSpinal FracturesAgedBone CementsFemaleHumansSacrumTreatment OutcomeBone CementsOs sacrumOsteoporosisOsteosynthesisPain therapySacroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33301083
OpenAlexW3111559976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.