ArticleEJNMMI research2020
Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical evaluation of tissue-dependent and spatially-variant positron range correction for Gallium-68 PET imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Impact of tissue-independent positron range correction on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Small animal PET with spontaneous inhalation ofJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024Article
- Image Denoising of Low-Dose PET Mouse Scans with Deep Learning: Validation Study for Preclinical Imaging Applicability.Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Article
- A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Evaluation ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Positron Range Corrections and Denoising Techniques for Gallium-68 PET Imaging: A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Comparison of image quality and spatial resolution betweenEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022Article
- Compensating Positron Range Effects of Ga-68 in Preclinical PET Imaging by Using Convolutional Neural Network: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Whole-body PET Imaging of T-cell Response to Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
- Performance of nanoScan PET/CT and PET/MR for quantitative imaging ofEJNMMI research · 2021Article
- Comparison of: (2Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Design Study of a Novel Positron Emission Tomography System for Plant Imaging.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Spatial resolution and image quality of radionuclides for PET imaging.Nuclear medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated the image quality of
results
conclusionsThe systems performed most optimal in terms of NEMA image quality parameters when using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.