Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301070›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021

[Enhanced imaging in urological endoscopy].

M C Kriegmair, S Hein, D S Schoeb, H Zappe, R Suárez-Ibarrola, F Waldbillig, B Gruene, P-F Pohlmann, F Praus, K Wilhelm and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2021
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

M C KriegmairKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. maximilian.kriegmair@umm.de.
S HeinMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Sektion Urotechnologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
D S SchoebMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Sektion Urotechnologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
H ZappeInstitut für Mikrosystemtechnik - IMTEK, Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
R Suárez-IbarrolaMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Sektion Urotechnologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
F WaldbilligKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
B GrueneKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
P-F PohlmannMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Sektion Urotechnologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
F PrausMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Sektion Urotechnologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
K WilhelmMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Sektion Urotechnologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
C GratzkeMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Sektion Urotechnologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
A MiernikMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Sektion Urotechnologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
C BolenzKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEHeidelberg University · DEMedizinische Fakultät MannheimUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White light cystoscopy and the concise documentation of pathological findings are standard diagnostic procedures in urology. Additional imaging modalities and technical innovations may support clinicians in the detection of bladder tumors. Modern endoscopy systems provide ultra-high-resolution imaging and the option of digital contrast enhancement. Photodynamic diagnostics and narrow band imaging are well-established in clinical routine and have shown significant benefits in the detection of bladder cancer. By means of multispectral imaging, different modalities can now be combined in real-time. Probe-based procedures such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) or Raman spectroscopy can further contribute to advanced imaging through an "optical biopsy" which may primarily improve diagnostics in the upper urinary tract. The aim of all techniques is to optimize the detection rate in order to achieve a more accurate diagnosis, resection and lower recurrence rates. Current research projects aim to digitalize the documentation of endoscopy and also make it more patient- and user-friendly. In the future, the use of image processing and artificial intelligence may automatically support the surgeon during endoscopy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystoscopyHumansNarrow Band ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBladder cancerCystscopyFluorescencePhotodynamic imagingUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33301070
OpenAlexW3111643319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.