Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33300980›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Origin of a Giant Sex Chromosome.

Matthew A Conte, Frances E Clark, Reade B Roberts, Luohao Xu, Wenjing Tao, Qi Zhou, Deshou Wang, Thomas D Kocher

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Near-complete genomes for nine haplochromine cichlid fishes reveal a novel centromeric satellite structure organised around a pair of inverted elements.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Genome assemblies forFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Why not Y naught.Heredity · 2022
    Review
  18. Insights into chromosomal evolution and sex determination of Pseudobagrus ussuriensis (Bagridae, Siluriformes) based on a chromosome-level genome.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Are plant and animal sex chromosomes really all that different?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew A ConteDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Frances E ClarkDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Reade B RobertsDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Luohao XuDepartment of Neuroscience and Developmental Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wenjing TaoKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Qi ZhouDepartment of Neuroscience and Developmental Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Deshou WangKey Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Thomas D KocherDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · USSouthwest University · CNUniversity of Vienna · ATNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome size and morphology vary within and among species, but little is known about the proximate or ultimate causes of these differences. Cichlid fish species in the tribe Oreochromini share an unusual giant chromosome that is ∼3 times longer than the other chromosomes. This giant chromosome functions as a sex chromosome in some of these species. We test two hypotheses of how this giant sex chromosome may have evolved. The first hypothesis proposes that it evolved by accumulating repetitive elements as recombination was reduced around a dominant sex determination locus, as suggested by canonical models of sex chromosome evolution. An alternative hypothesis is that the giant sex chromosome originated via the fusion of an autosome with a highly repetitive B chromosome, one of which carried a sex determination locus. We test these hypotheses using comparative analysis of chromosome-scale cichlid and teleost genomes. We find that the giant sex chromosome consists of three distinct regions based on patterns of recombination, gene and transposable element content, and synteny to the ancestral autosome. The WZ sex determination locus encompasses the last ∼105 Mb of the 134-Mb giant chromosome. The last 47 Mb of the giant chromosome shares no obvious homology to any ancestral chromosome. Comparisons across 69 teleost genomes reveal that the giant sex chromosome contains unparalleled amounts of endogenous retroviral elements, immunoglobulin genes, and long noncoding RNAs. The results favor the B chromosome fusion hypothesis for the origin of the giant chromosome.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSex ChromosomesAnimalsCichlidsDNA Transposable ElementsFemaleGenomeMaleSyntenyDNA Transposable Elementschromosome evolutionchromosome fusiongenetic conflictgenome evolutionsex chromosomessupernumerary chromosome

Identifiers

PMID33300980
PMCPMC8042771
OpenAlexW3111483350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.