Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33300950›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2021

Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Using Lower Dosage and Higher Frequency vs Observation on Disease-Free Survival Among Patients With Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Had Received Standard Treatment: The SYSUCC-001 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Xi Wang, Shu-Sen Wang, Heng Huang, Li Cai, Li Zhao, Rou-Jun Peng, Ying Lin, Jun Tang, Jian Zeng, Le-Hong Zhang and 29 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 127 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01112826 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III Study of Adjuvant Capecitabine Metronomic Chemotherapy in Triple-negative Operable Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2010 to 2019Enrolled443ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCapecitabine
NCT06413212 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Exploratory Study of Precise Therapy for Advanced Tumor Patients With Malignant Hydrothorax or Ascites by Using PTC Drug Sensitivity Testing

TypeobservationalSponsorLiu HuangRan2023 to 2025Enrolled55ConditionsLung Cancer, Breast Cancer, Gastric Cancer, Colorectal CancerArmsPatient-derived tumor-like cell clusters (PTC) drug sensitivity testing.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Triple-Negative PAM50 Non-Basal Breast Cancer Subtype Predicts Benefit from Extended Adjuvant Capecitabine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Observational
  20. Review

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Xi WangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shu-Sen WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Heng HuangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Lianjiang People's Hospital, Lianjiang, China.
Li CaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Li ZhaoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Guangzhou First People Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Rou-Jun PengDepartment of Integrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ying LinDepartment of Breast Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jun TangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jian ZengDepartment of Breast Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Le-Hong ZhangDepartment of Breast Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yong-Li KeDepartment of Breast Oncology, General Hospital of PLA Guangzhou Military Area, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xian-Ming WangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xin-Mei LiuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Haikou People's Hospital, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Qian-Jun ChenDepartment of Breast Oncology, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
An-Qin ZhangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fei XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xi-Wen BiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jia-Jia HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ji-Bin LiDepartment of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dan-Mei PangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Foshan First People's Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Cong XueDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yan-Xia ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhen-Yu HeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Huan-Xin LinDepartment of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xin AnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wen XiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ye CaoDepartment of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ying GuoDepartment of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yan-Hong SuKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Xin HuaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xin-Yue WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ruo-Xi HongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kui-Kui JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chen-Ge SongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhang-Zan HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wei ShiState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.
Yong-Yi ZhongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhong-Yu YuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
South China Breast Cancer Group (SCBCG)
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaSun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Foshan · CNGeneral Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command · CNGuangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CNGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNHaikou City People's Hospital · CNHarbin Medical University · CNKarolinska Institutet · SEQujiang People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Macau · MO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Among all subtypes of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer has a relatively high relapse rate and poor outcome after standard treatment. Effective strategies to reduce the risk of relapse and death are needed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of low-dose capecitabine maintenance after standard adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted at 13 academic centers and clinical sites in China from April 2010 to December 2016 and final date of follow-up was April 30, 2020. Patients (n = 443) had early-stage triple-negative breast cancer and had completed standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive capecitabine (n = 222) at a dose of 650 mg/m2 twice a day by mouth for 1 year without interruption or to observation (n = 221) after completion of standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included distant disease-free survival, overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and adverse events. Results: Among 443 women who were randomized, 434 were included in the full analysis set (mean [SD] age, 46 [9.9] years; T1/T2 stage, 93.1%; node-negative, 61.8%) (98.0% completed the trial). After a median follow-up of 61 months (interquartile range, 44-82), 94 events were observed, including 38 events (37 recurrences and 32 deaths) in the capecitabine group and 56 events (56 recurrences and 40 deaths) in the observation group. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 82.8% in the capecitabine group and 73.0% in the observation group (hazard ratio [HR] for risk of recurrence or death, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.95]; P = .03). In the capecitabine group vs the observation group, the estimated 5-year distant disease-free survival was 85.8% vs 75.8% (HR for risk of distant metastasis or death, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.38-0.92]; P = .02), the estimated 5-year overall survival was 85.5% vs 81.3% (HR for risk of death, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.47-1.19]; P = .22), and the estimated 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival was 85.0% vs 80.8% (HR for risk of locoregional recurrence or death, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.46-1.13]; P = .15). The most common capecitabine-related adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (45.2%), with 7.7% of patients experiencing a grade 3 event. Conclusions and Relevance: Among women with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who received standard adjuvant treatment, low-dose capecitabine maintenance therapy for 1 year, compared with observation, resulted in significantly improved 5-year disease-free survival. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01112826.

Indexed as

AdultCapecitabineChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHand-Foot SyndromeHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingObservationCapecitabine

Identifiers

PMID33300950
PMCPMC7729589
OpenAlexW3110870031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.