Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33300665›Full record

ReviewHuman brain mapping2022

Ten years of enhancing neuro-imaging genetics through meta-analysis: An overview from the ENIGMA Genetics Working Group.

Sarah E Medland, Katrina L Grasby, Neda Jahanshad, Jodie N Painter, Lucía Colodro-Conde, Janita Bralten, Derrek P Hibar, Penelope A Lind, Fabrizio Pizzagalli, Sophia I Thomopoulos and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Population Neuroscience: Principles and Advances.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sarah E MedlandPsychiatric Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1382-380X
Katrina L GrasbyPsychiatric Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Neda JahanshadImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, USA.
Jodie N PainterPsychiatric Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Lucía Colodro-CondePsychiatric Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Janita BraltenDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Derrek P HibarImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, USA.
Penelope A LindPsychiatric Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Fabrizio PizzagalliImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, USA.
Sophia I ThomopoulosImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0046-4070
Jason L SteinDepartment of Genetics & UNC Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-0513
Barbara FrankeDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nicholas G MartinGenetic Epidemiology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Paul M ThompsonImaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, USA.
ENIGMA Genetics Working Group

Funding

Training U54EB020403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2014 to 2018
$10.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020403NIH HHS EB020403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we review the motivation for creating the enhancing neuroimaging genetics through meta-analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium and the genetic analyses undertaken by the consortium so far. We discuss the methodological challenges, findings, and future directions of the genetics working group. A major goal of the working group is tackling the reproducibility crisis affecting "candidate gene" and genome-wide association analyses in neuroimaging. To address this, we developed harmonized analytic methods, and support their use in coordinated analyses across sites worldwide, which also makes it possible to understand heterogeneity in results across sites. These efforts have resulted in the identification of hundreds of common genomic loci robustly associated with brain structure. We have found both pleiotropic and specific genetic effects associated with brain structures, as well as genetic correlations with psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Indexed as

BrainGeneticsGenome-Wide Association StudyMental DisordersMeta-Analysis as TopicNervous System DiseasesNeuroimagingHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicGWASMRIneuro-imaging genetics

Identifiers

PMID33300665
PMCPMC8675405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.