Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33300545›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

The Impact of Surgical Strategy and Rifampin on Treatment Outcome in Cutibacterium Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Katharina Kusejko, Álvaro Auñón, Bernhard Jost, Benito Natividad, Carol Strahm, Christine Thurnheer, Daniel Pablo-Marcos, Dorsaf Slama, Giulia Scanferla, Ilker Uckay and 19 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic resistance rates inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Gentamicin fails to eradicateJournal of bone and joint infection · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Combination Antibiotic Therapy for Orthopedic Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Successful Treatment ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 19 institutions in 8 countries.

Katharina KusejkoDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Álvaro AuñónIIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Bernhard JostDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Benito NatividadHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Departament of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carol StrahmDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Christine ThurnheerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel Pablo-MarcosHospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain.
Dorsaf SlamaCochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Giulia ScanferlaDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ilker UckayUniversity Hospital Zurich, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland.
Isabelle WaldmannDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jaime EstebanIIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime Lora-TamayoHospital Univ. 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Martin ClaussCenter for Musculoskeletal Infections, Department for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, and Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Marta Fernandez-SampedroHospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain.
Marjan Wouthuyzen-BakkerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Matteo Carlo FerrariHumanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS and Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Milan, Italy.
Natalie GassmannDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Parham SendiDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Philipp JentDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Philippe C MorandAPHP.Centre -Université de Paris, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Prakhar VijayvargiyaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rihard TrebšeMedical Faculty University of Ljubljana, Valdoltra Orthopedic Hospital, Ankaran, Slovenia.
Robin PatelMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Roger D KouyosDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stéphane CorvecService de Bactériologie- Hygiène hospitalière, CRCINA, Université de Nantes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Tobias Siegfried KramerCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Berlin, Germany LADR Zentrallabor Dr. Kramer und Kollegen, Geesthacht, Germany.
Vincent A StadelmannDepartment of Research and Development, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yvonne AchermannDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of St.Gallen · CHCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRHôpital Cochin · FRHumanitas University · ITKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESSchulthess-Klinik · CHUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Ljubljana · SIWaldkrankenhaus Protestant Hospital · DE

Funding

Molecular Detection of Biofilms on Hip and Knee ImplantsR01AR056647 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PATEL, ROBIN · 2009 to 2020
$4.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutibacterium species are common pathogens in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). These infections are often treated with β-lactams or clindamycin as monotherapy, or in combination with rifampin. Clinical evidence supporting the value of adding rifampin for treatment of Cutibacterium PJI is lacking.

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated patients with Cutibacterium PJI and a minimal follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined by the absence of infection relapse or new infection. We used Fisher's exact tests and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the effect of rifampin and other factors on clinical success after PJI.

resultsWe included 187 patients (72.2% male, median age 67 years) with a median follow-up of 36 months. The surgical intervention was a 2-stage exchange in 95 (50.8%), 1-stage exchange in 51 (27.3%), debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in 34 (18.2%), and explantation without reimplantation in 7 (3.7%) patients. Rifampin was included in the antibiotic regimen in 81 (43.3%) cases. Infection relapse occurred in 28 (15.0%), and new infection in 13 (7.0%) cases. In the time-to-event analysis, DAIR (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.15, P = .03) and antibiotic treatment over 6 weeks (adjusted HR = 0.29, P = .0002) significantly influenced treatment failure. We observed a tentative evidence for a beneficial effect of adding rifampin to the antibiotic treatment-though not statistically significant for treatment failure (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .07) and not for relapses (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .10).

conclusionsWe conclude that a rifampin combination is not markedly superior in Cutibacterium PJI, but a dedicated prospective multicenter study is needed.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsRifampinAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsDebridementFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifampinantibiotic treatmentCutibacterium speciesperiprosthetic joint infectionsPropionibacterium speciesrifampin

Identifiers

PMID33300545
PMCPMC8427719
OpenAlexW3112795052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.