ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2022
Amalgam Phase-Down Part 2: UK-Based Knowledge, Opinions, and Confidence in the Alternatives.
Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- EFCD Expert Non-Consensus on Material and Technique Use for Direct Class II Composites With Guidance on Restoring Complex Cavities.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2026Article
- Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Restorations: Amalgam Dominates.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Article
- Amalgam versus composite restorations: a cost-consequence analysis.British dental journal · 2026Article
- Experts' Willingness to Restore With Direct Composite: Complexity, Cuspal Coverage, and Techniques.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2026Article
- The long-term oral health consequences of an amalgam phase-out.British dental journal · 2025Review
- Dental Amalgam Phase-Down-Status, Alternatives, Strategies and Preparedness for Implementation: A Review.International journal of dentistry · 2025Review
- Knowledge on the Minamata Convention on Mercury and dental amalgam phase down, availability and selection of mercury-free restorative materials among dentists in Kenya: a cross-sectional study.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
- A Finite Element Method Study of Stress Distribution in Dental Hard Tissues: Impact of Access Cavity Design and Restoration Material.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Blinded Comparative Study of Four Commercially Available LEDs and a Laser Light Curing Device.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Five-Year Clinical Performance of Complex Class II Resin Composite and Amalgam Restorations-A Retrospective Study.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- Public Valuation of Direct Restorations: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Journal of dental research · 2022Article
- Developments in resin-based composites.British dental journal · 2022Review
- Power output from 12 brands of contemporary LED light-curing units measured using 2 brands of radiometers.PloS one · 2022Article
- Sectional matrix solutions: the distorted truth.British dental journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAmalgam use has recently been phased down, and the potential for a phase-out is being investigated.
objectivesThe study aimed to identify knowledge of the phase-down and opinions of a potential phase-out of amalgam by UK primary care clinicians and assess their confidence in using different materials in different situations.
methodsAn anonymized, prepiloted cross-sectional e-survey was used to assess primary care clinicians' knowledge and opinions of the amalgam phase-down and potential phase-out and their confidence in using amalgam and the alternatives in different situations. In total, 11,902 invitations were distributed through British dentist and therapist associations. Prior hypotheses were tested alongside descriptive statistics.
resultsResponse rate was 13% (
conclusionPrimary care clinicians have major personal and patient-centered concerns regarding the amalgam phase-down (of which they have limited knowledge) and potential phase-out. Many lack confidence in using the alternative, composite, to restore posterior teeth in difficult situations, whereas confidence in using amalgam in similar situations is high. Effective education of clinicians and understanding patients' needs, alongside policy changes, are required to enable a successful amalgam phase-down and potential phase-out. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: This study shows that UK primary care clinicians are worried about the phase-down of amalgam for themselves and their patients. Many lack confidence in the alternative, composite, when used in difficult situations, which is in stark contrast to amalgam. Knowledge of the phase-down is limited. There is a need for more effective education of clinicians, an understanding of patients' values, and policy changes to ensure the success of the phase-down and potential phase-out of amalgam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.