Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33300416›Full record

ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2022

Amalgam Phase-Down Part 1: UK-Based Posterior Restorative Material and Technique Use.

O Bailey, C R Vernazza, S Stone, L Ternent, A-G Roche, C Lynch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Restorations: Amalgam Dominates.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developments in resin-based composites.British dental journal · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

O BaileySchool of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
C R VernazzaSchool of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6927-2974
S StoneSchool of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
L TernentPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
A-G RocheBritish Dental Association, London, UK.
C LynchUniversity Dental School & Hospital, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Newcastle University · GBBritish Dental Association · GBUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

Department of Health CS-2014-14-011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA European Union amalgam phase-down has recently been implemented. Publicly funded health care predominates in the United Kingdom with the system favoring amalgam use. The current use of amalgam and its alternatives has not been fully investigated in the United Kingdom.

objectivesThe study aimed to identify direct posterior restorative techniques, material use, and reported postoperative complication incidence experienced by primary care clinicians and differences between clinician groups.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was distributed to primary care clinicians through British dentist and therapist associations (11,092 invitations). The questionnaire sought information on current provision of direct posterior restorations and perceived issues with the different materials. Descriptive statistical and hypothesis testing was performed.

resultsDentists' response rate was 14% and therapists' estimated minimum response rate was 6% (total

conclusionAmalgam use is currently high in the publicly funded sector of UK primary care. Composite is the most used alternative, but it takes longer to place and is more costly. Composite also has a higher reported incidence of postoperative complications than amalgam, but time-consuming techniques, such as sectional matrix use, can mitigate against food packing, but their use is low. Therefore, major changes in health service structure and funding and posterior composite education are required in the United Kingdom and other countries where amalgam use is prevalent, as the amalgam phase-down continues. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: This study presents data on the current provision of amalgam for posterior tooth restoration and its directly placed alternatives by primary care clinicians in the United Kingdom, where publicly funded health care with copayment provision predominates. The information is important to manage and plan the UK phase-down and proposed phase-out of amalgam and will be of interest to other, primarily developing countries where amalgam provision predominates in understanding some of the challenges faced.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental Restoration, PermanentCross-Sectional StudiesDental AmalgamDental MaterialsComposite ResinsDental AmalgamDental Materialscaries treatmentclinical outcomescomposite materialshealth services researchrestorative dentistryrestorative materials

Identifiers

PMID33300416
PMCPMC8674792
OpenAlexW3112907178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.