Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33300414›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Implementation and Usefulness of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.

María Alejandra Hincapié, Juan Carlos Gallego, Andrés Gempeler, Jorge Arturo Piñeros, Daniela Nasner, María Fernanda Escobar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07664865 (Digitalization of Procedures for Neuropsychological Assessment for Neurocognitive Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 157 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07664865 completednot on this map

Digitalization of Procedures for Neuropsychological Assessment for Neurocognitive Disorders: Standardization and Clinical Validation of the Teleneuropsychology Platform Tenèpsia®

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" FoundationRan2024 to 2025Enrolled250ConditionsCognitive Impairment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Screening-Related Apps.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Feasibility of initial telemedicine follow-up after spinal fusion for AIS.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

María Alejandra HincapiéUniversidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.
Juan Carlos GallegoUniversidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.
Andrés GempelerFundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-9500
Jorge Arturo PiñerosUniversidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.
Daniela NasnerFundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia.
María Fernanda EscobarFundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-0890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIdentify and summarize the available literature on the acceleration in the use of telemedicine in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, with an aim to provide justification and guidance for its implementation to overcome the limitations associated with the pandemic worldwide.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review through different search strategies in MEDLINE and Google Scholar to identify the available literature reporting data on implementation and usefulness of various modalities of telemedicine during the current pandemic. We summarized the included studies according to field and mode of implementation in a narrative way.

resultsWe included 45 studies that fulfilled selection criteria. About 38% of the studies were conducted in the United States of America (USA), followed by 15.5% in India and 15.5% in China. Most studies (73%) were cross-sectional studies based on historical records. All publications were written in English with the exception of 1 studied published in Spanish. The majority of reports focused on use of telemedicine for outpatient care, followed by in-hospital care.

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has promoted the use of telemedicine, a tool that has transformed the provision of medical services. Several modes of implementation are useful to overcome difficulties for patient care during the pandemic. Its benefits are specific to different fields of medical practice. Such benefits, along with the guidance and reported experiences should invite health systems to work for an effective and comprehensive implementation of telemedicine in various fields.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsPatient SatisfactionRemote ConsultationSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineCOVID-19pandemicSARS-CoV-2telehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33300414
PMCPMC7734546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.