Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33300221›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Repurposing of some anti-infective drugs for COVID-19 treatment: A surveillance study supported by an in silico investigation.

Ahmed M Sayed, Ahmed M Khalaf, Mohamed E A Abdelrahim, Marwa O Elgendy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Antibiotics for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed M SayedPharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nahda University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Ahmed M KhalafInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Mohamed E A AbdelrahimClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-8404
Marwa O ElgendyClinical Pharmacy Department, Teaching Hospital of Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Beni-Suef University · EGNahda University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe repurposing of nitazoxanide, doxycycline and azithromycin may be effective to improve the symptoms in mild and moderate COVID-19 subjects. This study aimed to detect and explain the efficacy of reusing of these drugs in treating COVID-19.

methodsThe study was divided into two parts: clinical and computational parts. In the clinical part, 80 (30 females) subjects with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 with mild and moderate symptoms were enrolled in the study. Subjects were treated with azithromycin or doxycycline, and nitazoxanide was added to the treatment if the subject had diarrhoea. Subjects were divided into four groups: Group 1: subjects treated with azithromycin (20 subjects); Group 2: subjects treated with doxycycline (20 subjects); Group 3: subjects treated with a combination of nitazoxanide and doxycycline (20 subjects); and Group 4: subjects treated with a combination of nitazoxanide and azithromycin (20 subjects). In the computational part, we docked the three drugs against all currently available COVID-19-related protein targets (viral and non-viral). Subsequently, top hits were subjected to molecular dynamic simulations (MDSs) (50 ns) and binding free energy calculations to further validate the docking experiments and to investigate the binding modes of the potential inhibitors.

resultsThe symptomatic improvement of mild to moderate subjects was seen on the fifth day after starting treatment in Group 3 and Group 4 and on the seventh day in Group 2. However, for Group 1, the symptomatic improvement of mild to moderate subjects was not seen on the fifth day and required replacement by doxycycline to get the symptomatic improvement. None of the subjects needed intensive care admission and no deaths were reported. In silico, results were in good accordance with the clinical outcomes, where both nitazoxanide and doxycycline achieved the best docking scores against the viral ADP-ribose phosphatase (ADPRP) and the human Adaptor-Associated Kinase 1 (AAK1). MDSs revealed that both drugs were stable in their bindings indicating that they can be considered as lead molecules for targeting ADPRP and AAK1.

conclusionThe clinical and computational studies applied on three FDA-approved antimicrobials together with their recent clinical findings revealed that both nitazoxanide and doxycycline have great therapeutic potential against COVID-19. The future in vitro mechanistic investigation may confirm our primary computational outcomes, and in turn, these classes of compounds provide a promising starting point for further anti-COVID-19 therapeutics.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug RepositioningPharmaceutical PreparationsAdolescentComputer SimulationFemaleHumansLactationMaleSARS-CoV-2Pharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID33300221
PMCPMC7883047
OpenAlexW3111978683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.