Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33300203›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Effect of capmatinib on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin and rosuvastatin administered as a 2-drug cocktail in patients with MET-dysregulated advanced solid tumours: A phase I, multicentre, open-label, single-sequence drug-drug interaction study.

Enrique Grande, Monica Giovannini, Eddie Marriere, Philippe Pultar, Michelle Quinlan, Xinhui Chen, Gholamreza Rahmanzadeh, Giuseppe Curigliano, Xiaoming Cui

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. An Observatory for theCancers · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Enrique GrandeMedical Oncology Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Monica GiovanniniNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Eddie MarriereNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Philippe PultarNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Michelle QuinlanNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Xinhui ChenNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Gholamreza RahmanzadehNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Giuseppe CuriglianoIstituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Xiaoming CuiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Novartis (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHTris Pharma (United States) · USMD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid · ESUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCapmatinib, an orally bioavailable, highly potent and selective MET inhibitor, was recently approved to treat adult patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer with METex14 skipping mutations. The study investigated the effect of capmatinib on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of digoxin and rosuvastatin in patients with MET-dysregulated advanced solid tumours.

methodsThis was a multicentre, open-label, single-sequence study. An oral drug cocktail containing 0.25 mg digoxin and 10 mg rosuvastatin was administered to adult patients with MET-dysregulated advanced solid tumours on Day 1, and then on Day 22 with capmatinib. Between Days 11 and 32, capmatinib 400 mg was administered twice daily to ensure the attainment of steady state for drug-drug interaction assessment. Pharmacokinetics of cocktail drugs and safety of capmatinib were evaluated.

resultsThirty-two patients were enrolled. Compared to digoxin alone, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum concentration for digoxin plus capmatinib were 1.47 (1.28, 1.68) and 1.74 (1.43, 2.13), respectively. Compared to rosuvastatin alone, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of area under the curve to infinity and maximum concentration for rosuvastatin plus capmatinib were 2.08 (1.56, 2.76) and 3.04 (2.36, 3.92), respectively. Most frequent adverse events (≥25% for all grades) were nausea, asthenia, constipation, vomiting, peripheral oedema and pyrexia. Most frequent Grade 3/4 adverse events (≥5%) were anaemia, pulmonary embolism, asthenia, dyspnoea, nausea and vomiting.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that capmatinib is an inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP transporters, with clinically relevant drug-drug interaction potential. Capmatinib was well-tolerated and no unexpected safety concerns were observed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2BenzamidesDigoxinDrug InteractionsHumansImidazolesNeoplasm ProteinsRosuvastatin CalciumTriazinesATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2BenzamidescapmatinibDigoxinImidazolesNeoplasm ProteinsPharmaceutical PreparationsRosuvastatin CalciumTriazinescapmatinibdigoxinINC280METpharmacokineticsrosuvastatin

Identifiers

PMID33300203
PMCPMC8359310
OpenAlexW3111301842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.