Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299773›Full record

ArticleGlobal heart2020

Effect of Nurse-Based Management of Hypertension in Rural Western Kenya.

Rajesh Vedanthan, Anirudh Kumar, Jemima H Kamano, Helena Chang, Samantha Raymond, Kenneth Too, Deborah Tulienge, Charity Wambui, Emilia Bagiella, Valentin Fuster and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Global heart, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rajesh VedanthanDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, US.ORCID 0000-0001-7138-2382
Anirudh KumarDepartment of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, US.
Jemima H KamanoDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Moi University College of Health Sciences, Eldoret, KE.
Helena ChangDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, US.
Samantha RaymondDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, US.
Kenneth TooChronic Disease Management, Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare, Eldoret, KE.
Deborah TuliengeChronic Disease Management, Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare, Eldoret, KE.
Charity WambuiChronic Disease Management, Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare, Eldoret, KE.
Emilia BagiellaDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, US.
Valentin FusterMount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, US.
Sylvester KimaiyoDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Moi University College of Health Sciences, Eldoret, KE.

Funding

Nurse Management of Hypertension in Rural Western KenyaK01TW009218 · FIC · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI VEDANTHAN, RAJESH · 2011 to 2015
$638k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW009218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Elevated blood pressure is the leading cause of death worldwide; however, treatment and control rates remain very low. An expanding literature supports the strategy of task redistribution of hypertension care to nurses. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of a nurse-based hypertension management program in Kenya. Methods: We conducted a retrospective data analysis of patients with hypertension who initiated nurse-based hypertension management care between January 1, 2011, and October 31, 2013. The primary outcome measure was change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) over one year, analyzed using piecewise linear mixed-effect models with a cut point at 3 months. The primary comparison of interest was care provided by nurses versus clinical officers. Secondary outcomes were change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) over one year, and blood pressure control analyzed using a zero-inflated Poisson model. Results: The cohort consisted of 1051 adult patients (mean age 61 years; 65% women). SBP decreased significantly from baseline to three months (nurse-managed patients: slope -4.95 mmHg/month; clinical officer-managed patients: slope -5.28), with no significant difference between groups. DBP also significantly decreased from baseline to three months with no difference between provider groups. Retention in care at 12 months was 42%. Conclusions: Nurse-managed hypertension care can significantly improve blood pressure. However, retention in care remains a challenge. If these results are reproduced in prospective trial settings with improvements in retention in care, this could be an effective strategy for hypertension care worldwide.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementRural PopulationAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansHypertensionKenyaMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressureglobal healthhypertensionlow- and middle-income countriesnurse managementtask redistribution

Identifiers

PMID33299773
PMCPMC7716784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.