ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
Complicated Replanted Finger, 34 Years after Revascularization.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Merely a few reports of late failure (later than the 7th postoperative day) of a digital replantation can be found in the literature. Discussions of the factors that might cause a late failure are concise. To our knowledge, there are no reports of failure in literature as late as the case we are presenting. An 87-year-old white man was diagnosed with acute complications of a digital replantation, 34 years after initial surgery. Ultrasound examination and an arteriography demonstrated occlusion of the arterial anastomosis. The patient's surgical file revealed scars of former replantation surgery of both the index and the middle finger. In the latter, 1 artery and 2 veins were anastomosed. Considering the age and comorbidities of the patient, revascularization of the finger was not performed. Local wound care and analgesic drugs were prescribed. After initial deterioration and ulceration, gradual improvement was noticed. Total wound healing occurred at 3 months after the initial consultation. Compared with free flap surgery in general, finger replantations are at a higher risk of late complications because digital neovascularization is directly correlated to the contact surface area. This contact surface is usually larger in other free flaps. Furthermore, diseases that deteriorate circulation most likely affect the short- and the long-term survival of a digital replantation. From this point of view, performing both volar digital arterial anastomoses, whenever possible, might reduce early as well as late failure in replantation surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.