Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299657›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2020

Soluble forms of PD-L1 and PD-1 as prognostic and predictive markers of sunitinib efficacy in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Christopher Montemagno, Anais Hagege, Delphine Borchiellini, Brice Thamphya, Olivia Rastoin, Damien Ambrosetti, Juan Iovanna, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq, Camillio Porta, Sylvie Negrier and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Christopher MontemagnoBiomedical Department, Centre Scientifique De Monaco, principally of Monaco.
Anais HagegeCentre Antoine Lacassagne, University Cote d'Azur (UCA), Institute for research on cancer and aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284; INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nic, France.
Delphine BorchielliniUniversity Côte d'Azur, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Brice ThamphyaCentre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Statistic, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Olivia RastoinCentre Antoine Lacassagne, University Cote d'Azur (UCA), Institute for research on cancer and aging of Nice, CNRS UMR 7284; INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nic, France.
Damien AmbrosettiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) De Nice, Hôpital Pasteur, Central Laboratory of Pathology University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Juan IovannaTeam Pancreatic Cancer, Centre De Recherche En Cancérologie De Marseille (CRCM), Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-2237
Nathalie Rioux-LeclercqUniversity Hospital, Department of Pathology, Rennes, France.
Camillio PortaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, I.R.C.C.S. San Matteo University Hospital, Pavia, Italy (Present Affiliation: University of Bari 'A. Moro', Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2412-1563
Sylvie NegrierCentre Léon Bérard, University Hospital De Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jean-Marc FerreroUniversity Côte d'Azur, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Emmanuel ChamoreyCentre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Statistic, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Gilles PagèsBiomedical Department, Centre Scientifique De Monaco, principally of Monaco.
Maeva DufiesBiomedical Department, Centre Scientifique De Monaco, principally of Monaco.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRObservatoire de la Côte d’Azur · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRInternational University of Monaco · MCLyon College · USUniversity Hospital Foundation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) benefits from several treatment options in the first-line setting with VEGFR inhibitors and/or immunotherapy including anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD1 agents. Identification of predictive biomarkers is highly needed to optimize patient care. Circulating markers could reflect the biology of metastatic disease. Therefore, we evaluated soluble forms of PD-L1 (sPD-L1) and PD-1 (sPD-1) in mccRCC patients. The levels of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 were evaluated from plasma samples of mccRCC patients before they received a first-line treatment (T0) by the VEGFR inhibitor sunitinib (50 patients) or by the anti-VEGF bevacizumab (37 patients). The levels of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 were correlated to clinical parameters and progression-free survival (PFS). High levels of sPD-1 or sPDL1 were not correlated to PFS under bevacizumab while they were independent prognostic factors of PFS in the sunitinib group. Patients with high T0 plasmatic levels of sPD-L1 had a shorter PFS (11.3 vs 22.5 months,

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisSunitinibB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSunitinibccRCCimmune checkpoint inhibitorplasmatic markersoluble PD-1soluble PD-L1sPD-1sPD-L1sunitinib

Identifiers

PMID33299657
PMCPMC7714499
OpenAlexW3107429554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.