ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2020
Presentation of spinal cord and column tumors.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Residence in a rural setting is associated with lower five-year survival rates in patients that undergo spine surgery for breast cancer metastatic to the spine: A propensity matched analysis.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Radiological analysis correlated with neurological outcomes following resection of myxopapillary ependymoma: patient series.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Prevention and Management of Posterior Wound Complications Following Oncologic Spine Surgery: Narrative Review of Available Evidence and Proposed Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm.Global spine journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Epidemiological features of spinal intradural tumors, a single-center clinical study in Beijing, China.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- The role of multidisciplinary team meetings in the management of spinal tumors.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic spine disease occurs in more than 10% of all cancer patients. Advances in systemic treatment for cancer has led to improved overall survival for many types of cancer, which has increased the overall incidence of spinal metastases. The most common presenting complaint of patients with spinal metastases is pain. Pain originating from spinal metastases can be oncological, mechanical, and/or neurological in nature. Early recognition of these symptoms is helpful to guide treatment and accurately gauge patient prognosis. Unfortunately, the prevalence of degenerative back pain in the general population can complicate early clinical recognition of patients with metastatic spine disease. Therefore, back pain in any patient with a history of malignancy should prompt clinicians to perform an expedited workup for metastatic disease of the spine. Diagnostic imaging and laboratory studies are part of the initial work up. Obtaining pathology via biopsy to establish tumor histology is essential to determine the appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.