Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299472›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2020

Reliability of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) on cytological smears in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective validation study.

Costantino Ricci, Elisa Capizzi, Francesca Giunchi, Laura Casolari, Francesco Gelsomino, Karim Rihawi, Filippo Natali, Vanina Livi, Rocco Trisolini, Michelangelo Fiorentino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Costantino RicciDepartment of Pathology Maggiore Hospital , Bologna, Italy.
Elisa CapizziDepartment of Pathology, Department of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca GiunchiDepartment of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italia.
Laura CasolariDepartment of Medical Oncology.
Francesco GelsominoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Karim RihawiDepartment of Specialistic, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Filippo NataliDepartment of Interventional Pulmunology , Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vanina LiviUnit of Interventional Pulmonology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy.
Rocco TrisoliniUnit of Interventional Pulmonology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Largo Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy.
Michelangelo FiorentinoDepartment of Pathology, Maggiore Hospital, Via dell'Ospedale 8, Bologna, 40132, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-150X
Andrea ArdizzoniDepartment of Medical Oncology.
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITOspedale Maggiore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProgrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment is mandatory for the single agent pembrolizumab treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PD-L1 testing has been validated and is currently certified only on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded materials but not on cytological smears. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of patients, having only cytological material available, cannot be tested for PD-L1 and treated with pembrolizumab. In this study, we aimed to validate PD-L1 IHC on cytological smears prospectively by comparing clone SP263 staining in 150 paired histological samples and cytological smears of NSCLC patients.

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 150 consecutive advanced NSCLC patients. The clone SP263 was selected as, in a previous study of our group, it showed higher accuracy compared with clones 28-8 and 22-C3, with good cyto-histological agreement using a cut-off of 50%. For cyto-histological concordance, we calculated the kappa coefficient using two different cut-offs according to the percentage of PD-L1 positive neoplastic cells (<1%, 1-49% and ⩾50%; <50%, ⩾50%).

resultsThe overall agreement between histological samples and cytological smears was moderate (kappa = 0.537). However, when the cyto-histological concordance was calculated using the cut-off of 50%, the agreement was good (kappa = 0.740). With the same cut-off, and assuming as gold-standard the results on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded materials, PD-L1 evaluation on smears showed specificity and negative predictive values of 98.1% and 93.9%, respectively.

conclusionCytological smears can be used in routine clinical practice for PD-L1 assessment with a cut-off of 50%, expanding the potential pool of NSCLC patients as candidates for first-line single agent pembrolizumab therapy.

Indexed as

cytological smearsimmunohistochemistrynon-small cell lung cancerPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID33299472
PMCPMC7711224
OpenAlexW3108392998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.