Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299441›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2020

Brachytherapy in head and neck malignancies: Indian Brachytherapy Society (IBS) recommendations and guidelines.

Rajendra Bhalavat, Ashwini Budrukkar, Sarbani Ghosh Laskar, Dayanand Sharma, Ashutosh Mukherji, Manish Chandra, Umesh Mahantshetty, Vibhay Pareek, Pratibha Bauskar, Sonali Saraf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rajendra BhalavatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jupiter Lifelines Hospital, Thane, India.
Ashwini BudrukkarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, India.
Sarbani Ghosh LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, India.
Dayanand SharmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashutosh MukherjiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madanmohan Malviya Cancer Center and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, India.
Manish ChandraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jupiter Lifelines Hospital, Thane, India.
Umesh MahantshettyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, India.
Vibhay PareekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Pratibha BauskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jupiter Lifelines Hospital, Thane, India.
Sonali SarafDepartment of Oncoanesthesia, Jupiter Lifelines Hospital, Thane, India.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · INCancer Institute (WIA) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrachytherapy (BT) forms major treatment modality in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck cancers (HNC). However, there is a dearth of literature and guidelines for the use in various indications. High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in Indian scenario is an important treatment modality, and the recommendations in this guidelines aim to provide the necessary recommendations for the use of HDR-BT for uniform application across the country in patients with HNC. MATERIAL AND

methodsA panel consisting of members of the Indian Brachytherapy Society (IBS), based on their clinical experience was invited. The process involved defining important steps, precautions, target volumes and indications, thorough literature review, and discussion with fellow members. The guidelines were established and formulated the recommendations for HDR-BT based on available evidences and individual experience for sites, relevant to Indian settings.

resultsThe IBS recommends the use of HDR brachytherapy as a part of treatment of head and neck tumors. The scope of these guidelines and recommendations included practical suggestions, ensuring efficient use of brachytherapy treatment as radical with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost, palliative and adjuvant as definitive, or re-radiation as salvage for HNC in India. The IBS has made specific site-wise recommendations for previously untreated and recurrent HNC patients on their selection criteria, implant techniques, target volume definition, and HDR treatment parameters, such as time, dose rate, total dose, and fractionation schedules. Limited experience exists with HDR-BT in patients with head and neck cancers in India and across the globe.

conclusionsIBS provided a consensus statement and guidelines for the head and neck brachytherapy and believed that these recommendations will overcome the fear of practicing radiation oncologists. This should generate interest amongst students and will help radiation oncologists all across the country to use the art of brachytherapy carefully in HNC patients, with better curative and salvage options.

Indexed as

guidelinesHDR brachytherapyhead and neck malignanciesrecommendations

Identifiers

PMID33299441
PMCPMC7701929
OpenAlexW3111890861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.