Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299435›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2020

Biological dose summation of external beam radiotherapy for the whole breast and image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost in early-stage breast cancer.

Georgina Fröhlich, Norbert Mészáros, Viktor Smanykó, Csaba Polgár, Tibor Major

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgina FröhlichCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Norbert MészárosCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Viktor SmanykóCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba PolgárCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Tibor MajorCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
National Institute of Oncology · HUSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop an alternative method for summing biologically effective doses of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) boost in breast cancer. The total doses using EBRT boost were compared with BT boost using our method. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwenty-four EBRT plus interstitial HDR-BT plans were selected, and additional plans using EBRT boost were created. The prescribed dose was 2.67/40.05 Gy to whole breast and 4.75/14.25 Gy BT or 2.67/10.7 Gy EBRT to planning target volume (PTV) boost. EBRT and BT computed tomography (CT) were registered twice, including fitting the target volumes and using the lung, and the most exposed volume of critical organs in BT were identified on EBRT CT images. The minimal dose of these from EBRT was summed with their BT dose, and these EQD2 doses were compared using BT vs. EBRT boost. This method was compared with uniform dose conception (UDC).

resultsD

conclusionsBased on our biological dose summation method, the total dose of PTV in the breast is higher using BT boost than with EBRT. BT boost yields lower skin, lung, and heart doses, but higher dose to ribs. UDC overestimates lung and ribs doses.

Indexed as

boostbreast cancerdose summationintegrated biological dosesinterstitial brachytherapy

Identifiers

PMID33299435
PMCPMC7701920
OpenAlexW3097863804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.