Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299400›Full record

Trial reportNeural plasticity2020

Baseline Motor Impairment Predicts Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Physical Therapy-Induced Improvement in Individuals with Chronic Stroke.

Adriana Baltar, Daniele Piscitelli, Déborah Marques, Lívia Shirahige, Kátia Monte-Silva

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neural plasticity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06786000 (Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06786000 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Modified-Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) on Upper Limb Function Recovery in Patients with Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Saud UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsStroke, Hemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following Stroke, Stroke RehabilitatiomArmsAnodal tDCS combined with mCIMT, Cathodal tDCS combined with mCIMT, Bihemispheric tDCS combined with mCIMT, Sham tDCS combined with mCIMT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Predicting response to non-invasive brain stimulation in post-stroke upper extremity motor impairment: the importance of neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Adriana BaltarApplied Neuroscience Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2812-9343
Daniele PiscitelliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5240-3798
Déborah MarquesApplied Neuroscience Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-6024
Lívia ShirahigeApplied Neuroscience Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-0596
Kátia Monte-SilvaApplied Neuroscience Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7301-2553
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can enhance the effect of conventional therapies in post-stroke neurorehabilitation. The ability to predict an individual's potential for tDCS-induced recovery may permit rehabilitation providers to make rational decisions about who will be a good candidate for tDCS therapy. We investigated the clinical and biological characteristics which might predict tDCS plus physical therapy effects on upper limb motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. A cohort of 80 chronic stroke individuals underwent ten to fifteen sessions of tDCS plus physical therapy. The sensorimotor function of the upper limb was assessed by means of the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer scale (UE-FM), before and after treatment. A backward stepwise regression was used to assess the effect of age, sex, time since stroke, brain lesion side, and basal level of motor function on UE-FM improvement after treatment. Following the intervention, UE-FM significantly improved (

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAgedCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor DisordersPrognosisRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID33299400
PMCPMC7710411
OpenAlexW3107759335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.