Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299235›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2022

Shallow-depth sequencing of cell-free DNA for Hodgkin and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (differential) diagnosis: a standardized approach with underappreciated potential.

Lennart Raman, Malaïka Van der Linden, Ciel De Vriendt, Bliede Van den Broeck, Kristoff Muylle, Dries Deeren, Franceska Dedeurwaerdere, Sofie Verbeke, Amélie Dendooven, Katrien De Grove and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hodgkin lymphoma and liquid biopsy: a story to be told.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lennart RamanDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Malaïka Van der LindenDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Ciel De VriendtDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Bliede Van den BroeckDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Kristoff MuylleDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Delta, Roeselare.
Dries DeerenDepartment of Hematology, AZ Delta, Roeselare.
Franceska DedeurwaerdereDeparment of Pathology, AZ Delta, Roeselare.
Sofie VerbekeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Amélie DendoovenDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk.
Katrien De GroveDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Saskia BaertDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Kathleen ClaesCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Björn MentenCenter for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Fritz OffnerDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent.
Jo Van DorpeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent. Jo.VanDorpe@uzgent.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shallow-depth sequencing of cell-free DNA, a cheap and standardized approach to obtain molecular information on tumors non-invasively, is insufficiently explored for lymphoma diagnosis and disease follow-up. This study collected 318 samples, including longitudinal liquid and paired solid biopsies, from a prospectively recruited cohort of 38 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 85 aggressive B-cell non- HL patients, represented by 81 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cases. Following sequencing, copy number alterations and viral read fractions were derived and analyzed. At diagnosis, liquid biopsies showed detectable copy number alterations in 84.2% of HL (88.6% for classical HL) and 74.1% of DLBCL patients. Copy number profiles between liquid-solid pairs were highly concordant within DLBCL (r=0.815±0.043); and, compared to tissue, HL liquid biopsies had abnormalities with higher amplitudes (P=.010), implying that tumor DNA is more abundant in plasma. Additionally, 39.5% of HL and 13.6% of DLBCL cases had a significantly elevated number of plasmatic Epstein-Barr virus DNA fragments, achieving a sensitivity of 100% compared to current standard. Longitudinal analysis determined that, when detectable, copy number patterns were similar across (re)staging moments in refractory/relapsed patients. Moreover, the overall profile anomaly highly correlated with the total metabolic tumor volume (P.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHodgkin DiseaseLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID33299235
PMCPMC8719079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.