Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299185›Full record

ArticleNature2020

Impacts of speciation and extinction measured by an evolutionary decay clock.

Jennifer F Hoyal Cuthill, Nicholas Guttenberg, Graham E Budd

Erratum issuedAbstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The fate of South America's endemic mammalian fauna in response to the most dramatic Cenozoic climate disruption.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution buffered ants against extinction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Drivers of the artiodactyl turnover in insular western Europe at the Eocene-Oligocene Transition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Jennifer F Hoyal CuthillInstitute of Analytics and Data Science, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. j.hoyal-cuthill@essex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-9750
Nicholas GuttenbergEarth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Graham E BuddDepartment of Earth Sciences, Palaeobiology Programme, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9007-4369
Tokyo Institute of Technology · JPUniversity of Essex · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis that destructive mass extinctions enable creative evolutionary radiations (creative destruction) is central to classic concepts of macroevolution

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalFossilsGenetic SpeciationMachine LearningAnimalsHistory, AncientPlantsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33299185
OpenAlexW3111617348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.