Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299094›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Microbubble formulation influences inflammatory response to focused ultrasound exposure in the brain.

Dallan McMahon, Anne Lassus, Emmanuel Gaud, Victor Jeannot, Kullervo Hynynen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Nonspherical ultrasound microbubbles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dallan McMahonPhysical Science Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. dmcmahon@sri.utoronto.ca.
Anne LassusBracco Suisse S.A., Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland.
Emmanuel GaudBracco Suisse S.A., Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland.
Victor JeannotBracco Suisse S.A., Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland.
Kullervo HynynenPhysical Science Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Bracco (Switzerland) · CHSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Ultrasound Therapy Delivery Through Intact SkullR01EB003268 · NIBIB · SUNNYBROOK & WOMEN'S COLL HLTH SCIS CTR · PI HYNYNEN, KULLERVO · 2003 to 2020
$8.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused ultrasound and microbubble (FUS + MB)-mediated blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability enhancement can facilitate targeted brain-drug delivery. While controlling the magnitude of BBB permeability enhancement is necessary to limit tissue damage, little work has attempted to decouple these concepts. This work investigated the relationship between BBB permeability enhancement and the relative transcription of inflammatory mediators 4 h following sonication. Three microbubble formulations, Definity, BG8774, and MSB4, were compared, with the dose of each formulation normalized to gas volume. While changes in the transcription of key proinflammatory mediators, such as Il1b, Ccl2, and Tnf, were correlated to the magnitude of BBB permeability enhancement, these correlations were not independent of microbubble formulation; microbubble size distribution may play an important role, as linear regression analyses of BBB permeability magnitude versus differential gene expression for these proinflammatory mediators revealed significantly greater slopes for MSB4, a monodisperse microbubble with mean diameter of 4 μm, compared to Definity or BG8774, both polydisperse microbubbles with mean diameters below 2 μm. Additionally, the function of an acoustic feedback control algorithm, based on the detection threshold of ultraharmonic emissions, was assessed. While this control strategy was effective in limiting both wideband emissions and red blood cell extravasation, microbubble formulation was found to influence the magnitude of BBB leakage and correlations to acoustic emissions. This work demonstrates that while the initial magnitude of FUS + MB-mediated BBB permeability enhancement has a clear influence on the subsequent inflammatory responses, microbubble characteristics influence these relationships and must also be considered.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportBlood-Brain BarrierBrainDrug Delivery SystemsMaleMicrobubblesPermeabilityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySonicationUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonic Waves

Identifiers

PMID33299094
PMCPMC7725832
OpenAlexW3111969895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.