ArticleScientific reports2020
Multidimensional machine learning algorithms to learn liquid velocity inside a cylindrical bubble column reactor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For understanding the complex behavior of fluids in a multiphase chemical bubble column reactor, a combination of the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method and the adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) method is used to predict bubble flow inside a reactor based on the function of column height. In this study, the Euler-Euler model is employed as a CFD method. In the Eulerian method, continuity and momentum governing equations are mathematically computed for each phase, while the equations are connected together by source terms. After calculating the flow pattern and turbulence flow in the reactor, all data sets are used to prepare a fully artificial method for further prediction. This algorithm contains different learning dimensions such as learning in different directions of reactor or large amount of input parameters and data set representing "big data". The ANFIS method was evaluated in three steps by using one, two, and three inputs in each one to predict the liquid velocity in the x-direction (Ux). The x, y, and z coordinates of the location of the node of the liquid were considered as the inputs. Different percentages of data and various iterations and membership functions were used for training in the ANFIS method. The ANFIS method showed the best prediction using three inputs. This combination also shows the ability of computer science and computational methods in learning physical and chemical phenomena.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.