Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33299026›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A novel 3D in vitro model of the human gut microbiota.

Francesco Biagini, Marco Calvigioni, Anna Lapomarda, Alessandra Vecchione, Chiara Magliaro, Carmelo De Maria, Francesca Montemurro, Francesco Celandroni, Diletta Mazzantini, Monica Mattioli-Belmonte and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Development of anMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  11. Impact ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Three-Dimensional Humanized Model of the Periodontal Gingival Pocket to Study Oral Microbiome.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco BiaginiResearch Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 55122, Pisa, Italy.
Marco CalvigioniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via San Zeno 37, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
Anna LapomardaResearch Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 55122, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra VecchioneDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via San Zeno 37, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
Chiara MagliaroResearch Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 55122, Pisa, Italy.
Carmelo De MariaResearch Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 55122, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca MontemurroResearch Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 55122, Pisa, Italy.
Francesco CelandroniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via San Zeno 37, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
Diletta MazzantiniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via San Zeno 37, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
Monica Mattioli-BelmonteDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Science-DISCLIMO, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/A, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Emilia GhelardiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via San Zeno 37, 56127, Pisa, Italy. emilia.ghelardi@med.unipi.it.
Giovanni VozziResearch Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 55122, Pisa, Italy. g.vozzi@ing.unipi.it.
University of Pisa · ITPiaggio (Italy) · ITMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials and animal studies on the gut microbiota are often limited by the difficult access to the gut, restricted possibility of in vivo monitoring, and ethical issues. An easily accessible and monitorable in vitro model of the gut microbiota represents a valid tool for a wider comprehension of the mechanisms by which microbes interact with the host and with each other. Herein, we present a novel and reliable system for culturing the human gut microbiota in vitro. An electrospun gelatin structure was biofabricated as scaffold for microbial growth. The efficiency of this structure in supporting microbial proliferation and biofilm formation was initially assessed for five microbes commonly inhabiting the human gut. The human fecal microbiota was then cultured on the scaffolds and microbial biofilms monitored by confocal laser and scanning electron microscopy and quantified over time. Metagenomic analyses and Real-Time qPCRs were performed to evaluate the stability of the cultured microbiota in terms of qualitative and quantitative composition. Our results reveal the three-dimensionality of the scaffold-adhered microbial consortia that maintain the bacterial biodiversity and richness found in the original sample. These findings demonstrate the validity of the developed electrospun gelatin-based system for in vitro culturing the human gut microbiota.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodiversityBiofilmsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractGelatinHumansMicrobiotaModels, BiologicalTissue ScaffoldsGelatin

Identifiers

PMID33299026
PMCPMC7725811
OpenAlexW3112198946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.