Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298944›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2020

Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission.

Hannah Peckham, Nina M de Gruijter, Charles Raine, Anna Radziszewska, Coziana Ciurtin, Lucy R Wedderburn, Elizabeth C Rosser, Kate Webb, Claire T Deakin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 868 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
868citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

868 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Post-COVID-19 Jaw Osteonecrosis: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review

808 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hannah PeckhamCentre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-4683
Nina M de GruijterCentre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2694-0426
Charles RaineCentre for Rheumatology Research, Division of Medicine, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3462-0502
Anna RadziszewskaCentre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3885-3477
Coziana CiurtinCentre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8911-4113
Lucy R WedderburnCentre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7495-1429
Elizabeth C RosserCentre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4800-4695
Kate WebbDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology, School of Child and Adolescent Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. kate.webb@uct.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0003-1087-5946
Claire T DeakinCentre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis at UCL, UCLH, GOSH, London, UK. c.deakin@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-5801

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/M004600/1Medical Research Council MR/P028071/1Medical Research Council MR/R013926/1MRF_ MRF-057-0001-RG-ROSS-C0797Versus Arthritis 22203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence suggests that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, exhibits differences in morbidity and mortality between sexes. Here, we present a meta-analysis of 3,111,714 reported global cases to demonstrate that, whilst there is no difference in the proportion of males and females with confirmed COVID-19, male patients have almost three times the odds of requiring intensive treatment unit (ITU) admission (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.06, 3.92) and higher odds of death (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.31, 1.47) compared to females. With few exceptions, the sex bias observed in COVID-19 is a worldwide phenomenon. An appreciation of how sex is influencing COVID-19 outcomes will have important implications for clinical management and mitigation strategies for this disease.

Indexed as

MortalitySex FactorsCOVID-19FemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalePandemicsRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33298944
PMCPMC7726563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.