Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298828›Full record

ArticleLight, science & applications2020

A micromirror array with annular partitioning for high-speed random-access axial focusing.

Nathan Tessema Ersumo, Cem Yalcin, Nick Antipa, Nicolas Pégard, Laura Waller, Daniel Lopez, Rikky Muller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Light, science & applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan Tessema ErsumoThe University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4458-4728
Cem YalcinDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Nick AntipaDepartment of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Nicolas PégardDepartment of Applied Physical Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2868-7118
Laura WallerThe University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1243-2356
Daniel LopezPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Rikky MullerThe University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. rikky@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3791-1847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic axial focusing functionality has recently experienced widespread incorporation in microscopy, augmented/virtual reality (AR/VR), adaptive optics and material processing. However, the limitations of existing varifocal tools continue to beset the performance capabilities and operating overhead of the optical systems that mobilize such functionality. The varifocal tools that are the least burdensome to operate (e.g. liquid crystal, elastomeric or optofluidic lenses) suffer from low (≈100 Hz) refresh rates. Conversely, the fastest devices sacrifice either critical capabilities such as their dwelling capacity (e.g. acoustic gradient lenses or monolithic micromechanical mirrors) or low operating overhead (e.g. deformable mirrors). Here, we present a general-purpose random-access axial focusing device that bridges these previously conflicting features of high speed, dwelling capacity and lightweight drive by employing low-rigidity micromirrors that exploit the robustness of defocusing phase profiles. Geometrically, the device consists of an 8.2 mm diameter array of piston-motion and 48-μm-pitch micromirror pixels that provide 2π phase shifting for wavelengths shorter than 1100 nm with 10-90% settling in 64.8 μs (i.e., 15.44 kHz refresh rate). The pixels are electrically partitioned into 32 rings for a driving scheme that enables phase-wrapped operation with circular symmetry and requires <30 V per channel. Optical experiments demonstrated the array's wide focusing range with a measured ability to target 29 distinct resolvable depth planes. Overall, the features of the proposed array offer the potential for compact, straightforward methods of tackling bottlenecked applications, including high-throughput single-cell targeting in neurobiology and the delivery of dense 3D visual information in AR/VR.

Identifiers

PMID33298828
PMCPMC7596532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.