Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298612›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021

Variable Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection in European Expert Laboratories: External Quality Assessment, June and July 2020.

Carlo Fischer, Ramona Mögling, Angeliki Melidou, Arne Kühne, Edmilson F Oliveira-Filho, Thorsten Wolff, Janine Reiche, Eeva Broberg, Christian Drosten, Adam Meijer and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Improving public health laboratory preparedness at European Union level: learning points from experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of the fully automated, sample-to-result Seegene STARlet-AIOS platform for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus A, influenza virus B, and RSV.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nationwide external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests in Japan.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. RT-qPCR Diagnostics: The "Drosten" SARS-CoV-2 Assay Paradigm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: Potential to help reduce community spread?Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carlo Fischer *Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humbolt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany.
Ramona Mögling *Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3990-8329
Angeliki MelidouEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Arne KühneCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humbolt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany.
Edmilson F Oliveira-FilhoCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humbolt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany.
Thorsten WolffRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Janine ReicheRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Eeva BrobergEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian DrostenCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humbolt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany.
Adam MeijerCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Katrin LeitmeyerEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan Felix Drexler *Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humbolt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany felix.drexler@charite.de chantal.reusken@rivm.nl.
Chantal B E M Reusken *Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands felix.drexler@charite.de chantal.reusken@rivm.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, robust detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a key element for clinical management and to interrupt transmission chains. We organized an external quality assessment (EQA) of molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 for European expert laboratories. An EQA panel composed of 12 samples, containing either SARS-CoV-2 at different concentrations to evaluate sensitivity or other respiratory viruses to evaluate specificity of SARS-CoV-2 testing, was distributed to 68 laboratories in 35 countries. Specificity samples included seasonal human coronaviruses hCoV-229E, hCoV-NL63, and hCoV-OC43, as well as Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), SARS-CoV, and human influenza viruses A and B. Sensitivity results differed among laboratories, particularly for low-concentration SARS-CoV-2 samples. Results indicated that performance was mostly independent of the selection of specific extraction or PCR methods.

Indexed as

AlphainfluenzavirusBetainfluenzavirusCoronavirus 229E, HumanCoronavirus NL63, HumanCoronavirus OC43, HumanCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansLaboratoriesMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusCOVID-19diagnosticsEQAEuropemolecularSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33298612
PMCPMC8106723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.