Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298537›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Asymmetry of Auditory-Motor Speech Processing is Determined by Language Experience.

Ding-Lan Tang, Riikka Möttönen, Salomi S Asaridou, Kate E Watkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ding-Lan TangWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5128-278X
Riikka MöttönenSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4533-4277
Salomi S AsaridouWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-8575
Kate E WatkinsWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, United Kingdom kate.watkins@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-482X
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech processing relies on interactions between auditory and motor systems and is asymmetrically organized in the human brain. The left auditory system is specialized for processing of phonemes, whereas the right is specialized for processing of pitch changes in speech affecting prosody. In speakers of tonal languages, however, processing of pitch (i.e., tone) changes that alter word meaning is left-lateralized indicating that linguistic function and language experience shape speech processing asymmetries. Here, we investigated the asymmetry of motor contributions to auditory speech processing in male and female speakers of tonal and non-tonal languages. We temporarily disrupted the right or left speech motor cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and measured the impact of these disruptions on auditory discrimination (mismatch negativity; MMN) responses to phoneme and tone changes in sequences of syllables using electroencephalography (EEG). We found that the effect of motor disruptions on processing of tone changes differed between language groups: disruption of the right speech motor cortex suppressed responses to tone changes in non-tonal language speakers, whereas disruption of the left speech motor cortex suppressed responses to tone changes in tonal language speakers. In non-tonal language speakers, the effects of disruption of left speech motor cortex on responses to tone changes were inconclusive. For phoneme changes, disruption of left but not right speech motor cortex suppressed responses in both language groups. We conclude that the contributions of the right and left speech motor cortex to auditory speech processing are determined by the functional roles of acoustic cues in the listener's native language.

Indexed as

LanguageAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexSpeech PerceptionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultauditory-motor interactionhemispheric lateralizationmismatch negativitytonal language processingtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33298537
PMCPMC7880293
OpenAlexW3112132999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.