Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298471›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2020

Precarity and clinical determinants of healthcare-seeking behaviour and antibiotic use in rural Laos and Thailand.

Marco J Haenssgen, Nutcha Charoenboon, Thipphaphone Xayavong, Thomas Althaus

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03241316 (Antibiotics and Activity Spaces), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03241316 completednot on this map

Antibiotics and Activity Spaces: An Exploratory Study of Behaviour, Marginalisation, and Knowledge Diffusion

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2017 to 2018Enrolled5,885ConditionsAntibiotic Use, Rural Healthcare-seeking Behaviour, Marginalisation (Economic, Social, Spatial)ArmsObservational study of behaviour
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco J HaenssgenGlobal Sustainable Development, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK marco.haenssgen@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5849-7131
Nutcha CharoenboonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6975-3524
Thipphaphone XayavongJacobs, Cordova & Associates, Vientiane, Vientiane Capital, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Thomas AlthausCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford Centre for Tropical Medicine, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6997-3877

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S004769/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe social determinants of health are a decisive yet persistently understudied area for tackling global health challenges like antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Precarity is one determinant whose importance is increasingly recognised, which we define here as 'a form of pernicious self-dependence that undermines individuals' control over their own lives and limits their ability to flexibly respond to crises'. We aimed to assess the relationship between precarity, other forms of deprivation and healthcare-seeking behaviour by asking, 'What is the impact of precarity, marginalisation and clinical presentation on healthcare-seeking behaviour?' and 'Do patients experiencing precarious livelihoods have clinically less advisable healthcare-seeking behaviour?'

methodsWe used healthcare-seeking behaviour census survey data from rural Thailand and Laos, wherein five rural communities were surveyed two times over a period of 3 months (2-month recall period). Using descriptive statistical and multivariate logistic regression analysis on the illness level, we studied precarity alongside clinical presentation, marginalisation and facilitating solutions during an illness (eg, health-related phone use) as determinants of healthcare-seeking behaviour in the form of healthcare access and antibiotic use.

resultsThe data included 1421 illness episodes from 2066 villagers. Patients in precarious circumstances were up to 44.9 percentage points more likely to misuse antibiotics in the presence of situational facilitators (predicted antibiotic misuse: 6.2% (95% CI: 0.9% to 11.4%) vs 51.1% (95% CI: 16.6% to 85.5%) for precarious circumstances with/without facilitation). Marginalisation was linked to lower antibiotic use, but this did not translate into clinically more advisable behaviour. Clinical presentation played only a minor role in determining healthcare access and antibiotic use.

conclusionsThis study underlines the importance of context and local livelihoods in tackling drug resistance. While supporting the growing emphasis on AMR-sensitive development policy, we call for future research to study systematically the healthcare-seeking behaviour impact of precarious livelihoods, social policy and community development initiatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03241316.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsRural PopulationHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLaosThailandAnti-Bacterial Agentscommunity-based surveydiseasesdisordershealth policyinfectionsinjuriespublic health

Identifiers

PMID33298471
PMCPMC7733127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.