Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298421›Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2021

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management:

American Diabetes Association

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04862858 (Improving Outcomes in Patients With Comorbid T2DM and ASCVD), which is not on this map. Cited by 216 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
216citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04862858 naunknown statusnot on this map

Improving Outcomes in Patients With Comorbid T2DM and ASCVD: Population Health Management Interventions Supporting Guideline-recommended SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA Medications

TypeinterventionalSponsorHumana Inc.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled4,197ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cardiovascular DiseasesArmsEducational Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

216 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

156 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

American Diabetes Association

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusEndocrinologyHumansSocieties, MedicalStandard of Care

Identifiers

PMID33298421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.