ReviewClinical and translational allergy2020
Treatment of allergic rhinitis during and outside the pollen season using mobile technology. A MASK study.
Review in Clinical and translational allergy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- ARIA-EAACI 2025: Person-Centred, Digitally Enabled and Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Change Management in Airway Diseases: An OECD Best Practice for Integrated Care for Chronic Diseases.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
- Public health implications of allergic rhinitis information on YouTube and Bilibili: a cross-cultural analysis of content quality, engagement, and seasonal trends.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Allergic Rhinitis Environmental Control and Treatment in China.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Factors that influence user adherence of the Mask-air® application.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Adherence to Treatment in Allergic Rhinitis During the Pollen Season in Europe: A MASK-air Study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Article
- Why the role of mHealth in allergy diagnosis and treatment adherence cannot be overlooked.Clinical and translational allergy · 2023Review
- Self-Management in Allergic Rhinitis: Strategies, Outcomes and Integration into Clinical Care.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2023Review
- Digitally-enabled, patient-centred care in rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity: The ARIA-MASK-airClinical and translational allergy · 2023Article
- Real-life evidence in allergen immunotherapy: Moving forward with mHealth apps.Allergologie select · 2023Review
- Real-world data using mHealth apps in rhinitis, rhinosinusitis and their multimorbidities.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
- Mobile health app for monitoring allergic rhinitis and asthma in real life in Lithuanian MASK-air users.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
- Usage patterns of oral H1-antihistamines in 10 European countries: A study using MASK-air® and Google Trends real-world data.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022Article
- Allergen immunotherapy in MASK-air users in real-life: Results of a Bayesian mixed-effects model.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
- Corrigendum: Treatment of allergic rhinitis during and outside the pollen season using mobile technology. A MASK study.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
- Article
- Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air®.Clinical and translational allergy · 2021Review
- Differentiation of COVID-19 signs and symptoms from allergic rhinitis and common cold: An ARIA-EAACI-GAAllergy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
81 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe analysis of mobile health (mHealth) data has generated innovative insights into improving allergic rhinitis control, but additive information is needed. A cross-sectional real-world observational study was undertaken in 17 European countries during and outside the estimated pollen season. The aim was to collect novel information including the phenotypic characteristics of the users.
methodsThe Allergy Diary-MASK-air-mobile phone app, freely available via Google Play and App, was used to collect the data of daily visual analogue scales (VASs) for overall allergic symptoms and medication use. Fluticasone Furoate (FF), Mometasone Furoate (MF), Azelastine Fluticasone Proprionate combination (MPAzeFlu) and eight oral H1-antihistamines were studied. Phenotypic characteristics were recorded at entry. The ARIA severity score was derived from entry data. This was an a priori planned analysis.
results9037 users filled in 70,286 days of VAS in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The ARIA severity score was lower outside than during the pollen season. Severity was similar for all treatment groups during the pollen season, and lower in the MPAzeFlu group outside the pollen season. Days with MPAzeFlu had lower VAS levels and a higher frequency of monotherapy than the other treatments during the season. Outside the season, days with MPAzeFlu also had a higher frequency of monotherapy. The number of reported days was significantly higher with MPAzeFlu during and outside the season than with MF, FF or oral H1-antihistamines.
conclusionsThis study shows that the overall efficacy of treatments is similar during and outside the pollen season and indicates that medications are similarly effective during the year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.