Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298119›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Differential vector competence of Ornithodoros soft ticks for African swine fever virus: What if it involves more than just crossing organic barriers in ticks?

Rémi Pereira De Oliveira, Evelyne Hutet, Renaud Lancelot, Frédéric Paboeuf, Maxime Duhayon, Fernando Boinas, Adalberto A Pérez de León, Serhii Filatov, Marie-Frédérique Le Potier, Laurence Vial

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Differential susceptibility of geographically distinctEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The First Molecular Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Rémi Pereira De OliveiraUMR Animals, Health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystems (ASTRE), French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France.
Evelyne HutetSwine Virology and Immunology Unit, Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Renaud LancelotUMR Animals, Health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystems (ASTRE), French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France.
Frédéric PaboeufSwine Virology and Immunology Unit, Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Maxime DuhayonUMR Animals, Health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystems (ASTRE), French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France.
Fernando BoinasCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health (CIISA), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, Lisbon, 1300-477, Portugal.
Adalberto A Pérez de LeónKnipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory and Veterinary Pest Genomics Center, US Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service (USDA-ARS), Kerrville, TX, USA.
Serhii FilatovNational Scientific Center Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine (NSC IECVM), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Marie-Frédérique Le PotierSwine Virology and Immunology Unit, Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Laurence VialUMR Animals, Health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystems (ASTRE), French Agricultural Research Center for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France. laurence.vial@cirad.fr.
Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Ecosystèmes · FRCEA Paris-Saclay · FRAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRKnipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory · USNational Scientific Center "Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine" · UAUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Defense Threat Reduction Agency U.S.C. 3318(b)-15217European Cooperation in Science and Technology CA15116National Science Foundation 2019-67015-28981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral species of soft ticks in genus Ornithodoros are known vectors and reservoirs of African swine fever virus (ASFV). However, the underlying mechanisms of vector competence for ASFV across Ornithodoros species remain to be fully understood. To that end, this study compared ASFV replication and dissemination as well as virus vertical transmission to descendants between Ornithodoros moubata, O. erraticus, and O. verrucosus in relation to what is known about the ability of these soft tick species to transmit ASFV to pigs. To mimic the natural situation, a more realistic model was used where soft ticks were exposed to ASFV by allowing them to engorge on viremic pigs.

methodsOrnithodoros moubata ticks were infected with the ASFV strains Liv13/33 (genotype I) or Georgia2007/1 (genotype II), O. erraticus with OurT88/1 (genotype I) or Georgia2007/1 (genotype II), and O. verrucosus with Ukr12/Zapo (genotype II), resulting in five different tick-virus pairs. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays targeting the VP72 ASFV gene was carried out over several months on crushed ticks to study viral replication kinetics. Viral titration assays were also carried out on crushed ticks 2 months post infection to confirm virus survival in soft ticks. Ticks were dissected. and DNA was individually extracted from the following organs to study ASFV dissemination: intestine, salivary glands, and reproductive organs. DNA extracts from each organ were tested by qPCR. Lastly, larval or first nymph-stage progeny emerging from hatching eggs were tested by qPCR to assess ASFV vertical transmission.

resultsComparative analyses revealed higher rates of ASFV replication and dissemination in O. moubata infected with Liv13/33, while the opposite was observed for O. erraticus infected with Georgia2007/1 and for O. verrucosus with Ukr12/Zapo. Intermediate profiles were found for O. moubata infected with Georgia2007/1 and for O. erraticus with OurT88/1. Vertical transmission occurred efficiently in O. moubata infected with Liv13/33, and at very low rates in O. erraticus infected with OurT88/1.

conclusionsThis study provides molecular data indicating that viral replication and dissemination in Ornithodoros ticks are major mechanisms underlying ASFV horizontal and vertical transmission. However, our results indicate that other determinants beyond viral replication also influence ASFV vector competence. Further research is required to fully understand this process in soft ticks.

Indexed as

African Swine Fever VirusAfrican Swine FeverAnimalsArgasidaeDisease VectorsGenome, ViralInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMortalityNymphOrnithodorosSus scrofaSwineViral LoadViremiaVirus ReplicationAfrican swine fever virusMolecular biologyOrnithodorosSoft tickVector competence

Identifiers

PMID33298119
PMCPMC7725119
OpenAlexW3112876017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.