Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298109›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

Stereotactic radiosurgery of benign brain tumors in elderly patients: evaluation of outcome and toxicity.

Daniel Rueß, Vera Weyer, Juman Tutunji, Stefan Grau, Martin Kocher, Mauritius Hoevels, Harald Treuer, Christian Baues, Maximilian I Ruge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Meningioma in the elderly.Neuro-oncology advances · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel RueßDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. daniel.ruess@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1811-5132
Vera WeyerDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Juman TutunjiDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan GrauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Martin KocherDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Mauritius HoevelsDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Harald TreuerDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christian BauesInstitute of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Maximilian I RugeDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely accepted as a therapeutic option for meningiomas (M) and vestibular schwannomas (VS). However, data on outcome and toxicity in the elderly population have rarely been reported in detail.

methodsAll patients aged ≥ 65 years with M or VS who underwent single fraction SRS were included. Patient data were analyzed in terms of clinical tumor control and incidence of early and late treatment related complications, which were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE),

resultsWe identified 245 patients with benign brain tumors (129 M and 116 VS, median tumor volume 2.9 ml, range 0.1-28). The median age was 71 years (range 65-86) and the mean follow-up times were 42 months (range 2-181). Tumors were irradiated with a median dose of 12.4 Gy. Actuarial clinical and radiological tumor control rates at 2, 5, and 10 years after SRS were 98%, 93%, and 88%, respectively. Recurrent tumors after previous treatment had a higher probability of post-radiosurgical progression (p < 0.001). Permanent toxicity (CTCAE I/II) were noted in 5.7%. No severe adverse events were observed during early and late follow up, although patients > 70 years had a slightly higher risk for toxicity (p = 0.027). The presence and extent of co-morbidities had no significant influence on local tumor control or toxicity.

conclusionSRS provides favorable tumor control with low risk for treatment-related severe complications. Thus, SRS should always be considered as treatment option for benign intracranial tumors (meningiomas, schwannomas), especially in the group of elderly patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesElderly patientsMeningiomaRadiosurgeryVestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID33298109
PMCPMC7724716
OpenAlexW3113139789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.