Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298076›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2020

Beyond the map: evidencing the spatial dimension of health inequalities.

Yohan Fayet, Delphine Praud, Béatrice Fervers, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Jean-Yves Blay, Françoise Ducimetiere, Guy Fagherazzi, Elodie Faure

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Burden ofBMJ global health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yohan FayetEquipe EMS - Département de Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France. yohan.fayet@lyon.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-4636
Delphine PraudDepartment Prevention Cancer Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Béatrice FerversDepartment Prevention Cancer Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Isabelle Ray-CoquardEquipe EMS - Département de Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France.
Jean-Yves BlayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
Françoise DucimetiereEquipe EMS - Département de Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France.
Guy FagherazziDigital Epidemiology and e-Health Research Hub, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Elodie FaureCenter of Epidemiology and Population Health, UMR 1018, Inserm, Paris South, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpatial inequalities in health result from different exposures to health risk factors according to the features of geographical contexts, in terms of physical environment, social deprivation, and health care accessibility. Using a common geographical referential, which combines indices measuring these contextual features, could improve the comparability of studies and the understanding of the spatial dimension of health inequalities.

methodsWe developed the Geographical Classification for Health studies (GeoClasH) to distinguish French municipalities according to their ability to influence health outcomes. Ten contextual scores measuring physical and social environment as well as spatial accessibility of health care have been computed and combined to classify French municipalities through a K-means clustering. Age-standardized mortality rates according to the clusters of this classification have been calculated to assess its effectiveness.

resultsSignificant lower mortality rates compared to the mainland France population were found in the Wealthy Metropolitan Areas (SMR = 0.868, 95% CI 0.863-0.873) and in the Residential Outskirts (SMR = 0.971, 95% CI 0.964-0.978), while significant excess mortality were found for Precarious Population Districts (SMR = 1.037, 95% CI 1.035-1.039), Agricultural and Industrial Plains (SMR = 1.066, 95% CI 1.063-1.070) and Rural Margins (SMR = 1.042, 95% CI 1.037-1.047).

conclusionsOur results evidence the comprehensive contribution of the geographical context in the constitution of health inequalities. To our knowledge, GeoClasH is the first nationwide classification that combines social, environmental and health care access scores at the municipality scale. It can therefore be used as a proxy to assess the geographical context of the individuals in public health studies.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesRural PopulationCitiesFranceHumansRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsEnvironmentFranceGeographyGISHealth care accessHealth inequalitiesPublic healthSocial deprivation

Identifiers

PMID33298076
PMCPMC7727185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.