Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298065›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2020

A cross-sectional survey of the readiness of consumers to adopt an environmentally sustainable diet.

Amy Culliford, Jane Bradbury

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05769907 (Motivational to Weight Loss Version 1), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05769907 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Motivational to Weight Loss Version 1 (MWL v.1): Protocol for a Feasibility Single-arm, Open-label Clinical Trial of a Motivational Interviewing, Stages and Processes of Change-based Intervention for Weight Loss in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreRan2023 to 2024Enrolled54ConditionsObesityArmsIntervention Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From Sustainability Consciousness to Sustainable Dietary Behaviours: The Mediating Roles of Food Waste and Food Preference.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sustainable Nutrition Knowledge and Behaviours in Highly Educated Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy CullifordFaculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK. amyculliford@hotmail.co.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1577-7598
Jane BradburyFaculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Edge Hill University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current food system is responsible for significant environmental damage therefore, encouraging consumers to adopt an environmentally sustainable diet is a key public health challenge. Dietary guidelines have been developed that outline recommendations for purchasing and consuming food in an environmentally sustainable manner, but they have not yet been incorporated in UK national dietary guidelines.

methodsVia an online survey of UK adults, we evaluated consumers' perceptions of the environmental benefit of various sustainable diet recommendations, their readiness to adopt these behaviours using the stage of change construct of the Transtheoretical Model, the factors that influenced their food choices, and their current consumption of plant- and animal-based sources of protein. Additionally, we investigated how demographic characteristics and food choice motives were associated with perceived environmental benefit of and readiness to adopt these sustainable diet recommendations.

resultsThe survey was completed by 442 participants (66% female, 80% aged 25-54 years, 85% with higher education). The majority of participants considered the recommendations to 'reduce consumption of air-freighted foods' (79%), 'reduce food waste' (75%), and 'buy locally grown produce' (78%) to have a high environmental benefit, whereas a smaller proportion of participants perceived 'prioritise plant-based proteins' (42%) and 'choose organic produce' (27%) to have a high environmental benefit. Differences in perceptions and readiness to adopt sustainable dietary behaviours were observed between demographic groups, with women significantly more likely than men to be in action/maintenance (A/M) stages of change for prioritising plant proteins (OR 0.54), and younger participants more likely to be in pre-contemplation/contemplation (PC/C) stages of change for 'choose organic produce' (OR 2.03) and 'choose sustainable fish' (OR 2.45). Health, cost, environmental sustainability and taste were the most commonly reported food choice motives. Reporting environmental sustainability as a food choice motive was associated with readiness to adopt sustainable diet recommendations.

conclusionsWe found that consumers in the UK are engaged with some aspects of sustainable diets but remain resistant to others. The results of this study indicate that acceptable dietary guidelines could be developed to address environmental sustainability. Several behaviours were identified that consumers were willing to adopt, but there were barriers preventing them, highlighting that policy action is required to enable behaviour change to occur. Differences between demographic groups highlight potential targets for future campaigns promoting sustainable diets.

Indexed as

FoodRefuse DisposalCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleBehaviour changeDietary guidelinesEnvironmentNutritionPlant-based dietsPublic healthStage of changeSustainable dietsTranstheoretical model

Identifiers

PMID33298065
PMCPMC7727219
OpenAlexW3111004176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.