Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298040›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2020

Effects on applying micro-film case-based learning model in pediatrics education.

Yuan Pan, Xiuqi Chen, Qiuwen Wei, Jinmin Zhao, Xun Chen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuan PanDepartment of Graduate Administration, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 22 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Xiuqi ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Qiuwen WeiDepartment of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jinmin ZhaoDepartment of Graduate Administration, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 22 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China. zhaojinmin@126.com.
Xun ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China. chenxun1227@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-755X

Funding

Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education JGY2020041Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education YCBZ2020047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn view of the harsh reality Chinese paediatricians face, the challenge of paediatric education is about instilling not only knowledge and clinical skills but also resilience and beliefs. The aim of the study is to explore a more effective method than the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model for optimizing educational outcomes by establishing an innovative, comprehensive, case-based learning (CBL) model combined with the micro-film technique (MF + CBL). This approach has four important components: interests (attraction), knowledge application, competency, and scenario coping skills.

methodsExperimental research was conducted via a controlled parallel group study. The total sample of 104 senior-year students (Chinese) majoring in clinical medicine was randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group was exposed to the MF + CBL model and the control group to the LBL model. Overall, the results were assessed after an 8-week course via a student self-assessment questionnaire, a satisfaction survey and the final examination.

resultsThe experimental group generally performed better than the control group on the student self-assessment (P<0.05), satisfaction survey (P<0.05), and final examination (80.02 ± 3.77 vs 73.65 ± 3.69, P = 0.000). The open question at the end of the questionnaire revealed that a small number of students did not favour the MF + CBL model due to its time- and energy-consuming features.

conclusionsCompared with LBL, the MF + CBL model was an innovative teaching method that promoted more comprehensive quality development. It represents an alternative model for optimizing the capacity of future paediatric doctors.

Indexed as

LearningPediatricsClinical CompetenceHumansStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesCase-based learningMicro-filmPaediatricsTeaching method

Identifiers

PMID33298040
PMCPMC7727213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.