Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33298019›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Design thinking during a health emergency: building a national data collection and reporting system.

Kara N Durski, Shalini Singaravelu, Dhamari Naidoo, Mamoudou Harouna Djingarey, Ibrahima Soce Fall, Ali Ahmed Yahaya, Bruce Aylward, Michael Osterholm, Pierre Formenty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Teaching Philosophy in a Teaching Portfolio: Domain Knowledge and Guidance.Advances in medical education and practice · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kara N DurskiWorld Health Organization Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Genève, Switzerland. durskik@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-626X
Shalini SingaraveluWorld Health Organization Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Genève, Switzerland.
Dhamari NaidooWorld Health Organization Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Genève, Switzerland.
Mamoudou Harouna DjingareyWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Cité du Djoué, P.O.Box 06, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Ibrahima Soce FallWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Cité du Djoué, P.O.Box 06, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Ali Ahmed YahayaWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Cité du Djoué, P.O.Box 06, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Bruce AylwardWorld Health Organization Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Genève, Switzerland.
Michael OsterholmUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Pierre FormentyWorld Health Organization Avenue Appia 20, 1202, Genève, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDesign thinking allows challenging problems to be redefined in order to identify alternative user-center strategies and solutions. To address the many challenges associated with collecting and reporting data during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, we used a design thinking approach to build the Global Ebola Laboratory Data collection and reporting system. MAIN TEXT: We used the five-stage Design Thinking model proposed by Hasso-Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. This approach offers a flexible model which focuses on empathizing, defining, ideating, prototyping, and testing. A strong focus of the methodology includes end-users' feedback from the beginning to the end of the process. This is an iterative methodology that continues to adapt according to the needs of the system. The stages do not need to be sequential and can be run in parallel, out of order, and repeated as necessary. Design thinking was used to develop a data collection and reporting system, which contains all laboratory data from the three countries during one of the most complicated multi-country outbreaks to date. The data collection and reporting system was used to orient the response interventions at the district, national, and international levels within the three countries including generating situation reports, monitoring the epidemiological and operational situations, providing forecasts of the epidemic, and supporting Ebola-related research and the Ebola National Survivors programs within each country.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates the numerous benefits that arise when using a design thinking methodology during an outbreak to solve acute challenges within the national health information system and the authors recommend it's use during future complex outbreaks.

Indexed as

EpidemicsHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaData CollectionDisease OutbreaksGuineaHumansLiberiaSierra LeoneData systemsDesign thinkingDisease outbreaksInformation Management System

Identifiers

PMID33298019
PMCPMC7725425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.