Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33297952›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography.

Dina Abdelhafiz, Jinbo Bi, Reda Ammar, Clifford Yang, Sheida Nabavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Breast Cancer Classification Using FCN and Beta Wavelet Autoencoder.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dina AbdelhafizDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269, CT, USA.
Jinbo BiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269, CT, USA.
Reda AmmarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269, CT, USA.
Clifford YangDepartments of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, 06030, CT, USA.
Sheida NabaviDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, 06269, CT, USA. sheida.nabavi@uconn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5996-1020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomatic segmentation and localization of lesions in mammogram (MG) images are challenging even with employing advanced methods such as deep learning (DL) methods. We developed a new model based on the architecture of the semantic segmentation U-Net model to precisely segment mass lesions in MG images. The proposed end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) based model extracts contextual information by combining low-level and high-level features. We trained the proposed model using huge publicly available databases, (CBIS-DDSM, BCDR-01, and INbreast), and a private database from the University of Connecticut Health Center (UCHC).

resultsWe compared the performance of the proposed model with those of the state-of-the-art DL models including the fully convolutional network (FCN), SegNet, Dilated-Net, original U-Net, and Faster R-CNN models and the conventional region growing (RG) method. The proposed Vanilla U-Net model outperforms the Faster R-CNN model significantly in terms of the runtime and the Intersection over Union metric (IOU). Training with digitized film-based and fully digitized MG images, the proposed Vanilla U-Net model achieves a mean test accuracy of 92.6%. The proposed model achieves a mean Dice coefficient index (DI) of 0.951 and a mean IOU of 0.909 that show how close the output segments are to the corresponding lesions in the ground truth maps. Data augmentation has been very effective in our experiments resulting in an increase in the mean DI and the mean IOU from 0.922 to 0.951 and 0.856 to 0.909, respectively.

conclusionsThe proposed Vanilla U-Net based model can be used for precise segmentation of masses in MG images. This is because the segmentation process incorporates more multi-scale spatial context, and captures more local and global context to predict a precise pixel-wise segmentation map of an input full MG image. These detected maps can help radiologists in differentiating benign and malignant lesions depend on the lesion shapes. We show that using transfer learning, introducing augmentation, and modifying the architecture of the original model results in better performance in terms of the mean accuracy, the mean DI, and the mean IOU in detecting mass lesion compared to the other DL and the conventional models.

Indexed as

MammographyNeural Networks, ComputerAutomationDatabases, FactualHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBreast cancerComputer-aided detection (CAD)Convolutional neural networks (CNNs)Deep learning (DL)DetectionGround truth maps (GTMs)LocalizationMachine learning (ML)Mammograms (MGs)Pre-processingRegion growingSegNetSemantic pixel-wise segmentationU-NetVanilla U-Net

Identifiers

PMID33297952
PMCPMC7724817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.