Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33297949›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Decoy selection for protein structure prediction via extreme gradient boosting and ranking.

Nasrin Akhter, Gopinath Chennupati, Hristo Djidjev, Amarda Shehu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. i4mC-GRU: Identifying DNA NComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nasrin AkhterDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, 22030, VA, USA.
Gopinath ChennupatiInformation Sciences (CCS-3) Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bikini At al Rd., Los Alamos, 87545, USA. gchennupati@lanl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6223-8570
Hristo DjidjevInformation Sciences (CCS-3) Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bikini At al Rd., Los Alamos, 87545, USA.
Amarda ShehuDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, 22030, VA, USA.

Funding

LANL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program 20160317ERNational Science Foundation 1900061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying one or more biologically-active/native decoys from millions of non-native decoys is one of the major challenges in computational structural biology. The extreme lack of balance in positive and negative samples (native and non-native decoys) in a decoy set makes the problem even more complicated. Consensus methods show varied success in handling the challenge of decoy selection despite some issues associated with clustering large decoy sets and decoy sets that do not show much structural similarity. Recent investigations into energy landscape-based decoy selection approaches show promises. However, lack of generalization over varied test cases remains a bottleneck for these methods.

resultsWe propose a novel decoy selection method, ML-Select, a machine learning framework that exploits the energy landscape associated with the structure space probed through a template-free decoy generation. The proposed method outperforms both clustering and energy ranking-based methods, all the while consistently offering better performance on varied test-cases. Moreover, ML-Select shows promising results even for the decoy sets consisting of mostly low-quality decoys.

conclusionsML-Select is a useful method for decoy selection. This work suggests further research in finding more effective ways to adopt machine learning frameworks in achieving robust performance for decoy selection in template-free protein structure prediction.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisComputational BiologyMachine LearningProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsThermodynamicsProteinsBasinsDecoy selectionEnergy landscapeMachine learningPurityRankingXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID33297949
PMCPMC7724862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.