Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33297572›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Bending Behaviour of Polymeric Materials Used on Biomechanics Orthodontic Appliances.

Ivo Domagała, Krzysztof Przystupa, Marcel Firlej, Daniel Pieniak, Agata Niewczas, Barbara Biedziak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ivo DomagałaDepartment of Facial Malformations, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Bukowska 70, 60-812 Poznań, Poland.
Krzysztof PrzystupaDepartment of Automation, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-2763
Marcel FirlejDepartment of Facial Malformations, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Bukowska 70, 60-812 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4680-0770
Daniel PieniakDepartment of Mechanics and Machine Building, University of Economics and Innovations in Lublin, Projektowa 4, 20-209 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7807-3515
Agata NiewczasDepartment of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics, Medical University of Lublin, Karmelicka 7, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.
Barbara BiedziakDepartment of Facial Malformations, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Bukowska 70, 60-812 Poznań, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLLublin University of Technology · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLUniversity of Economics and Innovation · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper discusses the issues of strength and creep of polymeric materials used in orthodontic appliances. Orthodontic biomechanics is focused on the movement of individual teeth or dental groups as a result of the force applied by orthodontic appliances. Stresses in the construction of functional and biomechanical appliances is generated when using the apparatus in the oral cavity. The orthodontic appliance must maintain its shape and not be damaged during treatment so strength and creep resistance are fundamental properties. It was assumed that the clinical success of orthodontic appliances can be determined by these performance properties. The aim of the work was the experimental assessment of comparative bending strength and creep resistance of selected popular polymer materials used in the production of biomechanical orthodontic appliances. Four commercial materials manufactured by the world class producers were tested: NextDent Ortho Rigid (Vertex-Dental B.V., Soesterberg, The Netherlands) marked as "1A"; Erkocryl (ERKODENT Erich Kopp GmbH, Pfalzgrafenweiler, Germany)-"2A"; Vertex Orthoplast (Vertex Dental B.V.), blue, marked as "3A" and material with the same name as "3A" but orange, marked in the article as "4A". All the tests were carried out after aging in artificial saliva for 48 h at a temperature of 37 °C. Flexular strength and flexular modulus were made using the three point bending method according to the ISO 178 technical standard. Creep tests were carried out according to the method contained in ISO 899-2. The creep test was carried out in an artificial saliva bath at 37 °C. The creep tests showed significant differences in the strength, modulus and deformability of the tested materials. The strength reliability of the tested materials also varied. The research shows that the 2A material can be used for orthodontic applications in which long-term stresses should be lower than 20 MPa.

Indexed as

bending strengthcreeporthodontic appliancesPMMA

Identifiers

PMID33297572
PMCPMC7731210
OpenAlexW3111923094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.