Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33296853›Full record

ArticleConsciousness and cognition2021

The role of affective touch in whole-body embodiment remains equivocal.

Mark Carey, Laura Crucianelli, Catherine Preston, Aikaterini Fotopoulou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Consciousness and cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Mind From Within: Visceral Roots of Human Cognition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark CareyDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Laura CrucianelliDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Catherine PrestonDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Catherine.preston@york.ac.uk.
Aikaterini FotopoulouDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

European Research Council 818070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have highlighted that affective touch delivered at slow velocities (1-10 cm/s) enhances body-part embodiment during multisensory illusions, yet its role towards whole-body embodiment is less established. Across two experiments, we investigated the role of affective touch towards subjective embodiment of a whole mannequin body within the full body illusion, amongst healthy females. Participants perceived affective touch to be more pleasant than non-affective touch, but this did not enhance subjective embodiment within the illusion and no interaction between synchrony (Experiment 1), or congruency (Experiment 2), and the velocity of touch was observed. Finally, the perceived pleasantness of touch was not modulated by subthreshold eating disorder psychopathology, as measured by means of a self-report questionnaire. Therefore, the present findings suggest that enhancement of embodiment due to affective touch may be body-part specific, and not generalise to greater ownership towards a whole body.

Indexed as

IllusionsTouch PerceptionBody ImageFemaleHuman BodyHumansTouchVisual PerceptionAffective touchBody ownershipEmbodimentFull body illusionMultisensory integration

Identifiers

PMID33296853
PMCPMC7116849
OpenAlexW3112650703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.