Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33296372›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Using lexical language models to detect borrowings in monolingual wordlists.

John E Miller, Tiago Tresoldi, Roberto Zariquiey, César A Beltrán Castañón, Natalia Morozova, Johann-Mattis List

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John E MillerArtificial Intelligence/Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, San Miguel, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-6112-0178
Tiago TresoldiDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2863-1467
Roberto ZariquieyHumanities Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, San Miguel, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-1421-1314
César A Beltrán CastañónArtificial Intelligence/Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, San Miguel, Lima, Peru.
Natalia MorozovaDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6731-4608
Johann-Mattis ListDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-8919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lexical borrowing, the transfer of words from one language to another, is one of the most frequent processes in language evolution. In order to detect borrowings, linguists make use of various strategies, combining evidence from various sources. Despite the increasing popularity of computational approaches in comparative linguistics, automated approaches to lexical borrowing detection are still in their infancy, disregarding many aspects of the evidence that is routinely considered by human experts. One example for this kind of evidence are phonological and phonotactic clues that are especially useful for the detection of recent borrowings that have not yet been adapted to the structure of their recipient languages. In this study, we test how these clues can be exploited in automated frameworks for borrowing detection. By modeling phonology and phonotactics with the support of Support Vector Machines, Markov models, and recurrent neural networks, we propose a framework for the supervised detection of borrowings in mono-lingual wordlists. Based on a substantially revised dataset in which lexical borrowings have been thoroughly annotated for 41 different languages from different families, featuring a large typological diversity, we use these models to conduct a series of experiments to investigate their performance in mono-lingual borrowing detection. While the general results appear largely unsatisfying at a first glance, further tests show that the performance of our models improves with increasing amounts of attested borrowings and in those cases where most borrowings were introduced by one donor language alone. Our results show that phonological and phonotactic clues derived from monolingual language data alone are often not sufficient to detect borrowings when using them in isolation. Based on our detailed findings, however, we express hope that they could prove to be useful in integrated approaches that take multi-lingual information into account.

Indexed as

LanguageModels, TheoreticalEntropyMarkov ChainsNeural Networks, ComputerPhoneticsRegression AnalysisReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID33296372
PMCPMC7725347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.