Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33296365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Hand hygiene intervention to optimize helminth infection control: Design and baseline results of Mikono Safi-An ongoing school-based cluster-randomised controlled trial in NW Tanzania.

Kenneth Makata, Safari Kinung'hi, Christian Hansen, Philip Ayieko, Simon Sichalwe, Onike Mcharo, Jeroen Ensink, Robert Dreibelbis, Sarah Rockowitz, Elialilia Okello and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kenneth MakataMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-5209-2347
Safari Kinung'hiNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Christian HansenMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Philip AyiekoMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Simon SichalweMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Onike McharoMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Jeroen EnsinkDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Robert DreibelbisDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah RockowitzJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Elialilia OkelloMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Heiner GrosskurthMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Saidi KapigaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-1753-4060
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMwanza Intervention Trials Unit · TZJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute for Medical Research · TZ

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901756Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSoil transmitted helminths (STH) can affect over 50% of children in some parts of Tanzania. Control measures involve annual deworming campaigns in schools, but re-infection is rapid. This paper presents the design and baseline survey results of an ongoing school-based cluster-randomised controlled trial in Kagera region, NW Tanzania. The trial aims to determine whether the effect of routine deworming on the prevalence of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura infections among school aged children can be sustained when combined with a behaviour change intervention promoting handwashing with water and soap.

methodsAs part of the trial, a total of 16 schools were randomised to receive the intervention (N = 8) or as controls (N = 8). Randomisation was stratified per district and restricted to ensure pre-trial STH prevalence was balanced between study arms. The combination intervention to be tested comprises class-room based teacher-led health education, improvement of handwash stations, coloured nudges to facilitate handwashing and parental engagement sessions. The impact evaluation involves two cross-sectional surveys conducted at baseline and endline. The objectives of the baseline survey were: (i) to confirm whether the deworming campaign was successful, and identify and treat students still infected about 2 weeks after deworming, (ii) to document any baseline differences in STH prevalence between trial arms, and (iii) to assess handwashing behaviours, and access to water and sanitation at school and home. We randomly sampled 35 students per class in Grades 1-6 (an average of 200 children per school), stratified to ensure equal representation between genders. Assenting students were interviewed using a structured questionnaire and asked to provide a stool specimen.

resultsResults of the baseline survey conducted about 2 weeks after deworming shows balanced demographic and STH prevalence data across trial arms. We observed a low prevalence of ascariasis (< 5%) as expected; however, the prevalence of trichuriasis was still about 35% in both arms.

conclusionThe randomisation procedure was successful in achieving a balanced distribution of demographic characteristics and helminth infections between trial arms. The intervention is being rolled out. The current deworming treatment regimen may need to be revised with regards to the treatment of trichuriasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthelminticsAscariasisAscaris lumbricoidesBehavior TherapyChildCombined Modality TherapyCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleHand HygieneHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansInfection ControlMaleAnthelminticsSoil

Identifiers

PMID33296365
PMCPMC7725373
OpenAlexW3112611169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.