Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33296271›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2020

Targeted Screening for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Eligibility in Two Emergency Departments in Washington, DC.

Paige Kulie, Amanda D Castel, Zhaonian Zheng, Natasha N Powell, Aneil Srivastava, Sandhya Chandar, Melissa L McCarthy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paige KulieDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Amanda D CastelDepartment of Epidemiology and Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Zhaonian ZhengDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Natasha N PowellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Aneil SrivastavaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Sandhya ChandarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Melissa L McCarthyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Washington University Medical Center · USMilken Institute · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Childrens NationalUL1TR001876 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BELL, MICHAEL J · 2016 to 2021
$25.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective method to prevent HIV acquisition in high-risk individuals. This cross-sectional survey study estimated the proportion of patients who were PrEP eligible among a targeted sample of emergency department (ED) patients with chief complaints indicative of HIV risk. Research assistants screened a convenience sample of adult patients who presented to two hospital EDs in Washington, DC, during a 6-month period with genitourinary, substance use, or intentional injury-related complaints. Patients with these complaints who reported being sexually active within the past 6 months and HIV negative completed a computer-assisted survey that included questions on sexual practices and partners, substance use, and attitudes and knowledge about PrEP. We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clinical guidelines to determine whether PrEP use was indicated. We report differences in PrEP eligibility by demographic characteristics, knowledge, and attitudes. Of the 410 participants, the majority were black (85%), and heterosexual females (72%). PrEP use was indicated in 20% (

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDistrict of ColumbiaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSexual PartnersAnti-HIV Agentsemergency medicineHIVpre-exposure prophylaxispreventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID33296271
PMCPMC7869869
OpenAlexW3113375795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.