Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33296103›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

MR elastography: Principles, guidelines, and terminology.

Armando Manduca, Philip J Bayly, Richard L Ehman, Arunark Kolipaka, Thomas J Royston, Ingolf Sack, Ralph Sinkus, Bernard E Van Beers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Armando ManducaPhysiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-5671
Philip J BaylyMechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Richard L EhmanPhysiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Arunark KolipakaDepartment of Radiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Thomas J RoystonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ingolf SackCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2460-1444
Ralph SinkusImaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bernard E Van BeersDepartment of Radiology, Université de Paris, Paris, France.

Funding

Magnetic Resonance ElastographyR37EB001981 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI EHMAN, RICHARD L. · 2016 to 2025
$4.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R37 EB001981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a phase contrast-based MRI technique that can measure displacement due to propagating mechanical waves, from which material properties such as shear modulus can be calculated. Magnetic resonance elastography can be thought of as quantitative, noninvasive palpation. It is increasing in clinical importance, has become widespread in the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis, and additional clinical applications are being explored. However, publications have reported MRE results using many different parameters, acquisition techniques, processing methods, and varied nomenclature. The diversity of terminology can lead to confusion (particularly among clinicians) about the meaning of and interpretation of MRE results. This paper was written by the MRE Guidelines Committee, a group formalized at the first meeting of the ISMRM MRE Study Group, to clarify and move toward standardization of MRE nomenclature. The purpose of this paper is to (1) explain MRE terminology and concepts to those not familiar with them, (2) define "good practices" for practitioners of MRE, and (3) identify opportunities to standardize terminology, to avoid confusion.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance Imagingelasticity imagingelastographymechanical propertiesMR elastographytissue stiffness

Identifiers

PMID33296103
PMCPMC8495610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.