Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33295962›Full record

ReviewThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2021

Review of How Genetic Research on Segmental Progeroid Syndromes Has Documented Genomic Instability as a Hallmark of Aging But Let Us Now Pursue Antigeroid Syndromes!

George M Martin, Fuki M Hisama, Junko Oshima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Somatic mutations and genome mosaicism in aging and disease.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is Myelodysplasia a Consequence of Normal Aging?Current oncology reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

George M MartinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Fuki M HisamaDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Junko OshimaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Migrating the National Long Term Care Survey to the MedRIC Health and Aging Data EnclaveR01AG063971 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STALLARD, P.J. ERIC · 2020 to 2024
$4.1M
International Registry of Werner SyndromeR01CA210916 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JUNKO OSHIMA · 2016 to 2026
$3.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this early contribution to the new Fellows Forum of this pioneering journal for what is now called Geroscience is to provide an example of how the author's interest in using the emerging tools of human genetics has led to strong support for one of the hallmarks of aging-Genomic Instability. We shall also briefly review our emerging interests in the genetic analysis of what we have called Antigeroid Syndromes. While there has been significant progress in that direction via genetic studies of centenarians, the search for genetic pathways that make individuals unusually resistant or resilient to the ravages of specific geriatric disorders has been comparatively neglected. We refer to these disorders as Unimodal Antigeroid Syndromes. It is our hope that our young colleagues will consider research efforts in that direction.

Indexed as

Genomic InstabilityAgingAlzheimer DiseaseCockayne SyndromeCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes MellitusFemaleGenetic ResearchHumansMaleMutationPhenotypeProgeriaSyndromeWerner SyndromeHuman agingHuman geneticsLongevityProgeroid syndromes

Identifiers

PMID33295962
PMCPMC7812512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.